X
0
1.
Cynic 13 year s ago
Just shoot her in the head. I'm not a bleeding heart liberal by any means, but any individual who drops this amount of cash to give cushy lives to little yappy dogs while others are struggling to get by on the most minimal level deserve pain.
       
0
2.
Max2342342 13 year s ago
@Cynic: You are wrong here. More people should be spending money. The 20K that she spend, part of it went to people make this stuff. Would you prefer that she would just hoard everything she makes, how many people would not have a job. The more money the Rich spend the better it is.
       
0
3.
Fire 13 year s ago
Kill them with fire.
       
0
4.
Nexus_6 13 year s ago
She's a stupid whore!
Quanta gente povera vivrebbe coi suoi soldi?
In Africa e in India ci sono migliaia di bambini che muoiono di fame...troia!
       
0
5.
I.am.Jack 13 year s ago
Oh snap .. there are people who don't have a shelter and those dogs... fuu.. burn them !!
       
0
6.
romania=shit 13 year s ago
rofl can't believe how many stupid people are visiting this website.
@I.am.Jack - keep your lame opinion 4 your medieval country, romanians cannot afford a house like that because they are lazy wankers. so i really wish someone burn romania instead of that dogs, scumbag
       
0
7.
BluePoint 13 year s ago
yaagh vomit
       
0
8.
diegopol 13 year s ago
-.-
       
0
9.
vulpes 13 year s ago
budala
       
0
10.
Peanut 13 year s ago
The dogs would probably be happier if they lived in her house. Animals don't care where they live, as long as they have someone who loves them.
       
0
11.
viper 13 year s ago
20000 for a fucking dog??? she so crazy!!
       
0
12.
Stonka 13 year s ago
America...


dash2
       
0
13.
Nan 13 year s ago
She should of gave 20,000 to a family that really needs the money not ass licking dogs. come on people!
       
0
14.
FWAT 13 year s ago
Peanut, I agree that.
They're happy with who love them.
       
0
15.
Mary 13 year s ago
It's her money to decide what she wants to do.
       
0
16.
4down2 13 year s ago
Does the train on the dogs n_wassat
       
0
17.
Kallenovsky 13 year s ago
What a sick fuck.
       
0
18.
SuperMilow 13 year s ago
seems a bit much but to some people there children are there dogs and spend 20000 on a child isnt crazy
       
0
19.
skinnyminny 13 year s ago
Obviously for her, the dogs are substitute kids. She has issues! Kids grow up, dogs never lose their cutsey-ness, and she is in her own little world where the puppy-wuppy-doggie-woggie needs his/her Mumsy-wumsy....bleurgh! Oh well, at least she has the money to provide the trades to make the crap in the first place. The tradesmen probably laughed all the way to the bank!
       
0
20.
squerell02 13 year s ago
dash2 dash2
       
0
21.
softybear 13 year s ago
Lots of bitter folks here. The money spent on this structure provided probably two months living for a couple of carpenters, helped support the lumber yard, etc., etc. This is called spreading the wealth.......or would you prefer that the government take their extra income and distribute it to non- productive people?
       
0
22.
Morpheus 13 year s ago
Bitch! That's a lot of money for a doggy style!
       
0
23.
L. 13 year s ago
It's her money and she can do whatever she wants!
       
0
24.
urs 12 year s ago
The money is not sticking in the house, it's in the hand of the craftsmen who built it. Hell, no, they gave it away to buy flowers for their wives, educate their children or drop a Dollar to somebody who always knows he's poor.
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot
{gallery_current}
X
Would You Like to Live in This House Worth $20000? (20 pics)
[next_image]>[/next_image] [next_post]>[/next_post]
{current_photo}/{total_photo}
[prev_image]<[/prev_image] [prev_post]<[/prev_post]
{current_fullsize}