2003: The Singing Forest
Critic Score: 1/100
User Score: 1.6/10
Synopsis: “Two lovers are killed during the Holocaust. One reincarnates first. He has a twenty two year old daughter who falls in love with who her father believes is his past life lover.”
Critic Review: “The Singing Forest’ was written and directed by Jorge Ameer, whose film ‘Strippers’ opened three years ago and remained the single worst movie I had ever reviewed — until now.”
-Stephen Holden / New York Times
3
1.
ZombieDarwin 6 year s ago
WTF? The majority of these reviews were written by Michael Moore, er, I mean, Roger Ebert, a.k.a. Humorless Progressive Sh^thead. I can think of 4 films right off the top of my head that are worse than the worst of these. I'm surprised Roger didn't eat the films as he reviewed them.
0
2.
ZombieDarwin 6 year s ago
You know, something has been bothering me about 2016's Hillary's America, and I've finally put my finger on it. The review is: *“Little more than an extended version of the kind of political screeds that can be found online with only a minimum of effort, this is just a terrible movie.”
-Roger Ebert*
The movie was released in 2016. Ebert died in 2013. Unless he's been able to send his reviews from Hell (I imagine they wouldn't have any problem securing the film itself, seeing as how Hillary was Lucifer's candidate), there's no way Ebert could have reviewed this film. So either the review is fake, the review is wrongly attributed, or this is just some political hit piece. The middle one is most likely, although the last is possible, too.
-Roger Ebert*
The movie was released in 2016. Ebert died in 2013. Unless he's been able to send his reviews from Hell (I imagine they wouldn't have any problem securing the film itself, seeing as how Hillary was Lucifer's candidate), there's no way Ebert could have reviewed this film. So either the review is fake, the review is wrongly attributed, or this is just some political hit piece. The middle one is most likely, although the last is possible, too.
-Roger Ebert*
The movie was released in 2016. Ebert died in 2013. Unless he's been able to send his reviews from Hell (I imagine they wouldn't have any problem securing the film itself, seeing as how Hillary was Lucifer's candidate), there's no way Ebert could have reviewed this film. So either the review is fake, the review is wrongly attributed, or this is just some political hit piece. The middle one is most likely, although the last is possible, too.