X
0
1.
Fnark 14 year s ago
Nice but most of these are photomanipulations, not photography.
       
0
2.
Glark 14 year s ago
Fnark these are photomanipulations made by the photographer of the photos, yes this stuff is also considered to be photography.
       
0
3.
dd 14 year s ago
Cool
       
0
4.
M 14 year s ago
mad skills dance
       
0
5.
Dreth 14 year s ago
Some are quite amazing although some are basic Photoshoping. But he is indeed creative.
       
0
6.
vulpes 14 year s ago
love it,great imagination
       
0
7.
A 14 year s ago
hes creative but too much photoshop.
       
0
8.
4down2 14 year s ago
Off the wall !
       
0
9.
DOC RogER 14 year s ago
So he stereo-types groups of people into a picture.

street Bum, hip hop gangsta, rapper, geek , alien , killer, homo, faggot hairdresser, drunken sailor, syborg, what's the big deal with these that haven't already been published elsewhere ?


elvis
       
0
10.
twig 14 year s ago
Photo-manipulation should not be considered photography.
       
0
11.
munkee 13 year s ago
Great concepts and execution. Original vs. Photoshop is totally irrelevant to the argument about the value of the imagery. However... I thought the acting/posing was so over-the-top contrived that it made almost every character look totally phony. 2 kute 4 comfort.
       
0
12.
squerell02 13 year s ago
clapping
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot
{gallery_current}
X
Creative, Unusual and Diverse Photography (58 pics)
[next_image]>[/next_image] [next_post]>[/next_post]
{current_photo}/{total_photo}
[prev_image]<[/prev_image] [prev_post]<[/prev_post]
{current_fullsize}