0
1.
Fnark 14 year s ago
Nice but most of these are photomanipulations, not photography.
0
2.
Glark 14 year s ago
Fnark these are photomanipulations made by the photographer of the photos, yes this stuff is also considered to be photography.
0
3.
dd 14 year s ago
Cool
0
4.
M 14 year s ago
mad skills 
0
5.
Dreth 14 year s ago
Some are quite amazing although some are basic Photoshoping. But he is indeed creative.
0
7.
A 14 year s ago
hes creative but too much photoshop.
0
9.
DOC RogER 14 year s ago
So he stereo-types groups of people into a picture.
street Bum, hip hop gangsta, rapper, geek , alien , killer, homo, faggot hairdresser, drunken sailor, syborg, what's the big deal with these that haven't already been published elsewhere ?
street Bum, hip hop gangsta, rapper, geek , alien , killer, homo, faggot hairdresser, drunken sailor, syborg, what's the big deal with these that haven't already been published elsewhere ?
0
10.
twig 14 year s ago
Photo-manipulation should not be considered photography.
0
11.
munkee 14 year s ago
Great concepts and execution. Original vs. Photoshop is totally irrelevant to the argument about the value of the imagery. However... I thought the acting/posing was so over-the-top contrived that it made almost every character look totally phony. 2 kute 4 comfort.
street Bum, hip hop gangsta, rapper, geek , alien , killer, homo, faggot hairdresser, drunken sailor, syborg, what's the big deal with these that haven't already been published elsewhere ?