0
2.
olla 14 year s ago
I like this. From the runway to the red carpet. Not the most outlandish dresses, but there are a few that look less than fabulous. Gwyneth Paltrow looks awkwardly bunchy in that Victoria Beckham sack dress.
Is it just me or is Diane Kruger wearing the dress... um, backwards?
Is it just me or is Diane Kruger wearing the dress... um, backwards?
0
4.
loomy 14 year s ago
i dont see much difference with the clothes
just the models are sickly skinny
just the models are sickly skinny
0
5.
hey 14 year s ago
What happened w/ Salma Hayek??? She loose way too much weight or her head just grow????? 
0
6.
f 14 year s ago
one the whole, those dresses are horrible (with the exception of the white Altuzarra, which is a classic design)and look horrible on both the models and celebs.
0
8.
Lord Fly 14 year s ago
Difference I generally see is:
Model: No boobs, no curves
Actress: Boobs, some with actual curves
Model: No boobs, no curves
Actress: Boobs, some with actual curves
1
11.
anon 14 year s ago
Those models have the proportions of comic book girls:
1 to 8, head to height ratio.
So their heads are usually smaller than average, and the legs are longer than average.
This head-to-height difference jumps out to be so obvious when comparing the runway models to the women who wear the stuff.
1 to 8, head to height ratio.
So their heads are usually smaller than average, and the legs are longer than average.
This head-to-height difference jumps out to be so obvious when comparing the runway models to the women who wear the stuff.
1
12.
dragonmamma/naomi 14 year s ago
Some of them (Scarlett Johansson, for example) look way better, whereas others (Janet Jackson) look like over-stuffed sausages.
Someone please force-feed sandwiches to those models.
Someone please force-feed sandwiches to those models.
3
14.
gi gi 14 year s ago
go for curves!!!
0
15.
.. 14 year s ago
those models make them fugly , think its coz they are 2 skinny , eat some food girlsssss
1
16.
lol 14 year s ago
saarah jessica parker is FYGLLYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
-1
18.
shedragon61 14 year s ago
Linsay Lohan...
Stuart Mackenzie: Look at the size of that girl's heed.
Tony Giardino: Shhh!
Stuart Mackenzie: I'm not kidding, it's like an orange on a toothpick.
Tony Giardino: Shhh, you're going to give the girl a complex.
Stuart Mackenzie: Well, that's a huge noggin. That's a virtual planetoid.
Stuart Mackenzie: Look at the size of that girl's heed.
Tony Giardino: Shhh!
Stuart Mackenzie: I'm not kidding, it's like an orange on a toothpick.
Tony Giardino: Shhh, you're going to give the girl a complex.
Stuart Mackenzie: Well, that's a huge noggin. That's a virtual planetoid.
1
21.
Bongo from Kongo 14 year s ago
GO CURVES!
Most of these dresses looks WAY better on the celebrities!
Most of these dresses looks WAY better on the celebrities!
Looks waaay better on real woman.
Is it just me or is Diane Kruger wearing the dress... um, backwards?
just the models are sickly skinny
Model: No boobs, no curves
Actress: Boobs, some with actual curves
1 to 8, head to height ratio.
So their heads are usually smaller than average, and the legs are longer than average.
This head-to-height difference jumps out to be so obvious when comparing the runway models to the women who wear the stuff.
Someone please force-feed sandwiches to those models.
Stuart Mackenzie: Look at the size of that girl's heed.
Tony Giardino: Shhh!
Stuart Mackenzie: I'm not kidding, it's like an orange on a toothpick.
Tony Giardino: Shhh, you're going to give the girl a complex.
Stuart Mackenzie: Well, that's a huge noggin. That's a virtual planetoid.
Most of these dresses looks WAY better on the celebrities!