Processing. Please wait...
X
Comments to #
1
All comments (19)
0
1.
polis
14 year s ago
This is yust stupid..
Reply
0
2.
lolipop
14 year s ago
fool
Reply
0
3.
Wenda
14 year s ago
What
Reply
0
4.
pb
14 year s ago
simple waste of material, money and safety
Reply
0
5.
Alkhoren
14 year s ago
... That's ... THAT'S WRONG !
Reply
0
6.
mtjs
14 year s ago
Hey guys,this is call deck bridge suspensory bridge,OK ? Is good bridge.It built in 1989.
Is new type of the bridge.
Reply
0
7.
GOODSTUFF4U
14 year s ago
a hammer with nine moving parts
Reply
0
8.
2Cool4Ice
14 year s ago
if you think this is dumb you'r dumb.
if they didnt poot the bottom plan on it the pillars needed be alot longer so they spared on material!
And now boats that have alot more with can go tru that river so its very smart in facts..,
Reply
0
9.
kryosis
14 year s ago
O_O' crazy
Reply
0
10.
Sambone
14 year s ago
Isn't an arch only strong when it is the other way around? Wouldn't there be even more room for boats then? ;-)
Reply
0
11.
severe_009
14 year s ago
WOW!? IS that structurally safe?
Reply
0
12.
Jayzen Freeze
14 year s ago
Doubt it. what safety inspector says yup this looks good WTF arches only work one way both ends down.
Reply
0
13.
You used stop-words.
14 year s ago
its safer than flying with an airplane
Reply
0
14.
un visiteur
14 year s ago
read invers the plan
Reply
0
15.
Apu Kalipshis
14 year s ago
An inverse arc do a better safety structure, and use the same material. I would not cross this bridge
Reply
0
16.
ludwig_rx
14 year s ago
chuck norris made this bridge!
Reply
0
17.
kelvinisme84
14 year s ago
lol, only in CHINA
Reply
0
18.
Peanut
14 year s ago
It looks a little scary.
Reply
0
19.
badmash
14 year s ago
I just signed up to your blogs rss feed. Will you post more on this subject?
Reply
random avatar
X
One Way to Build a Bridge
>
1
/
7
<
0
1.
polis
14 year s ago
This is yust stupid..
Reply
0
2.
lolipop
14 year s ago
fool
Reply
0
3.
Wenda
14 year s ago
What
Reply
0
4.
pb
14 year s ago
simple waste of material, money and safety
Reply
0
5.
Alkhoren
14 year s ago
... That's ... THAT'S WRONG !
Reply
0
6.
mtjs
14 year s ago
Hey guys,this is call deck bridge suspensory bridge,OK ? Is good bridge.It built in 1989.
Is new type of the bridge.
Reply
0
7.
GOODSTUFF4U
14 year s ago
a hammer with nine moving parts
Reply
0
8.
2Cool4Ice
14 year s ago
if you think this is dumb you'r dumb.
if they didnt poot the bottom plan on it the pillars needed be alot longer so they spared on material!
And now boats that have alot more with can go tru that river so its very smart in facts..,
Reply
0
9.
kryosis
14 year s ago
O_O' crazy
Reply
0
10.
Sambone
14 year s ago
Isn't an arch only strong when it is the other way around? Wouldn't there be even more room for boats then? ;-)
Reply
0
11.
severe_009
14 year s ago
WOW!? IS that structurally safe?
Reply
0
12.
Jayzen Freeze
14 year s ago
Doubt it. what safety inspector says yup this looks good WTF arches only work one way both ends down.
Reply
0
13.
You used stop-words.
14 year s ago
its safer than flying with an airplane
Reply
0
14.
un visiteur
14 year s ago
read invers the plan
Reply
0
15.
Apu Kalipshis
14 year s ago
An inverse arc do a better safety structure, and use the same material. I would not cross this bridge
Reply
0
16.
ludwig_rx
14 year s ago
chuck norris made this bridge!
Reply
0
17.
kelvinisme84
14 year s ago
lol, only in CHINA
Reply
0
18.
Peanut
14 year s ago
It looks a little scary.
Reply
0
19.
badmash
14 year s ago
I just signed up to your blogs rss feed. Will you post more on this subject?
Reply
random avatar
Is new type of the bridge.
if they didnt poot the bottom plan on it the pillars needed be alot longer so they spared on material!
And now boats that have alot more with can go tru that river so its very smart in facts..,