0
1.
polis 14 year s ago
This is yust stupid..
0
4.
pb 14 year s ago
simple waste of material, money and safety
0
6.
mtjs 14 year s ago
Hey guys,this is call deck bridge suspensory bridge,OK ? Is good bridge.It built in 1989.
Is new type of the bridge.
Is new type of the bridge.
0
8.
2Cool4Ice 14 year s ago
if you think this is dumb you'r dumb.
if they didnt poot the bottom plan on it the pillars needed be alot longer so they spared on material!
And now boats that have alot more with can go tru that river so its very smart in facts..,
if they didnt poot the bottom plan on it the pillars needed be alot longer so they spared on material!
And now boats that have alot more with can go tru that river so its very smart in facts..,
0
10.
Sambone 14 year s ago
Isn't an arch only strong when it is the other way around? Wouldn't there be even more room for boats then? ;-)
0
12.
Jayzen Freeze 14 year s ago
Doubt it. what safety inspector says yup this looks good WTF arches only work one way both ends down.
0
13.
You used stop-words. 14 year s ago
its safer than flying with an airplane
0
15.
Apu Kalipshis 14 year s ago
An inverse arc do a better safety structure, and use the same material. I would not cross this bridge
0
19.
badmash 14 year s ago
I just signed up to your blogs rss feed. Will you post more on this subject?
Is new type of the bridge.
if they didnt poot the bottom plan on it the pillars needed be alot longer so they spared on material!
And now boats that have alot more with can go tru that river so its very smart in facts..,