A Russian man walks in a forest near the village of Golovanovo, Ryazan region, on August 5, 2010. Russia struggled to contain the worst wildfires in its modern history, 50 dead victims, after President Dmitry Medvedev sacked top military officers for negligence in the catastrophe.
0
1.
Frondax 13 year s ago
96 x R.I.P.
96 x R.I.P. - #8
96 x R.I.P. - #8
0
2.
Shame on you 13 year s ago
All of these pics (except a tiny part) come from The Boston Big Picture which makes a pic recap every year. Even the title is the same.
You just made a copy-paste of this article without mentioning the origin of the pics. Adding a few photographs to make an "original" article is ridiculous.
Anyway, these pictures are NOT free of use, they are copyrighted material that you aren't allowed to reproduce. This article has nothing to do with fair use, it's indubitably a copyright infringement. Adding a simple small credit link doesn't change it.
A few days ago you cried about other sites taking "your" pictures. Now you're not only doing the exact same thing but also you're doing it illegally. Shame on you.
I didn't realize that even the captions are copied! But you suck so much that you kept the captions and remove the complete credits added to each picture!
It's not only illegal but also seriously lame. It has nothing to do with fair use, you just suck big time on this one. You really deserve being sued...
You just made a copy-paste of this article without mentioning the origin of the pics. Adding a few photographs to make an "original" article is ridiculous.
Anyway, these pictures are NOT free of use, they are copyrighted material that you aren't allowed to reproduce. This article has nothing to do with fair use, it's indubitably a copyright infringement. Adding a simple small credit link doesn't change it.
A few days ago you cried about other sites taking "your" pictures. Now you're not only doing the exact same thing but also you're doing it illegally. Shame on you.
I didn't realize that even the captions are copied! But you suck so much that you kept the captions and remove the complete credits added to each picture!
It's not only illegal but also seriously lame. It has nothing to do with fair use, you just suck big time on this one. You really deserve being sued...
0
5.
jajabings 13 year s ago
Source:
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/12/2010_in_photos_part_1_of_3.html
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/12/2010_in_photos_part_2_of_3.html
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/12/2010_in_photos_part_3_of_3.html
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/12/2010_in_photos_part_1_of_3.html
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/12/2010_in_photos_part_2_of_3.html
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/12/2010_in_photos_part_3_of_3.html
96 x R.I.P. - #8
You just made a copy-paste of this article without mentioning the origin of the pics. Adding a few photographs to make an "original" article is ridiculous.
Anyway, these pictures are NOT free of use, they are copyrighted material that you aren't allowed to reproduce. This article has nothing to do with fair use, it's indubitably a copyright infringement. Adding a simple small credit link doesn't change it.
A few days ago you cried about other sites taking "your" pictures. Now you're not only doing the exact same thing but also you're doing it illegally. Shame on you.
I didn't realize that even the captions are copied! But you suck so much that you kept the captions and remove the complete credits added to each picture!
It's not only illegal but also seriously lame. It has nothing to do with fair use, you just suck big time on this one. You really deserve being sued...
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/12/2010_in_photos_part_1_of_3.html
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/12/2010_in_photos_part_2_of_3.html
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/12/2010_in_photos_part_3_of_3.html