X
-1
1.
orendadude 10 year s ago
Might as well. Won't need the warplanes until they start bombing the shit out of Iran.
       
0
2.
ptpie 10 year s ago
cool yeh for the NAVY
       
0
3.
BillTheWelder 10 year s ago
And I get to build those awesome ships.
       
0
4.
gigantes 10 year s ago
i have a hard time believing this is cheaper or more practical than other methods. and aren't there more pressing needs for the carriers across the world? you know... under actual duty?
       
0
5.
smz 10 year s ago
Its not as tho it cost them any gas or anything been nuke powered, its probably cheap as to run
       
0
6.
gigantes 10 year s ago
nuke-powered vessels cost a hell of a lot to build and maintain. gas is the least of concerns.
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

What you see is the deck of the USS Ronald Reagan, a giant nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, covered in the vehicles of Navy Sailors and on its way in to Washington's Naval Base Kitsap during its homeport change for scheduled dock-planned incremental availability maintenance.

X
Maybe the World’s Most Expensive Parking Lot
>
1/12
<