0
3.
gigantes 12 year s ago
seems kind if pointless if those results are typical. working with film is expensive and wasteful, and there are other ways to get effects and tones like those working with modern cameras.
0
4.
h 12 year s ago
"working with film is expensive and wasteful" you need to learn/read more about photography.
0
5.
gigantes 12 year s ago
and what would i learn? that chemical baths aren't needed to develop? that rolls of specially-treated paper aren't necessary as a medium? that somehow oldschool photography is more efficient materials-wise than digital photography?
3
6.
Enter your name 12 year s ago
Like an old nokia's camera? Hipster must be running out of trendy ways to use cameras.
0
7.
RBrowntn 12 year s ago
Where the hell did you guys learn basic math?
1926
+100 years
-------------
2026
86 years old is hardly "almost 100"
1926
+100 years
-------------
2026
86 years old is hardly "almost 100"
1926
+100 years
-------------
2026
86 years old is hardly "almost 100"