I think it's a hyperbole of what ones would consider "atheistic behaviour". Imo, it's not religious propaganda, but a denunciation of religious prejudice. It's someones idea of the radical beliefs that religious people might have.
That is the mathematical formula for (Newtonian) gravity, which is a first-order theory. All first-order theories can be characterised by a mathematical formula.
Now where is your mathematical formula for evolution? There is none because it is a mere second-order theory. i.e. Evolution is a philosophical belief, not a science. All science uses mathematical formulas. Evolution does not.
Comment 9: If that is the closest to mathematics that anyone can come up with to support evolution, then the philosophy fails dismally to make the cut as science.
I think it's a hyperbole of what ones would consider "atheistic behaviour". Imo, it's not religious propaganda, but a denunciation of religious prejudice. It's someones idea of the radical beliefs that religious people might have.
That is the mathematical formula for (Newtonian) gravity, which is a first-order theory. All first-order theories can be characterised by a mathematical formula.
Now where is your mathematical formula for evolution? There is none because it is a mere second-order theory. i.e. Evolution is a philosophical belief, not a science. All science uses mathematical formulas. Evolution does not.
Comment 9: If that is the closest to mathematics that anyone can come up with to support evolution, then the philosophy fails dismally to make the cut as science.
f = G . m1.m2 / r.r
That is the mathematical formula for (Newtonian) gravity, which is a first-order theory. All first-order theories can be characterised by a mathematical formula.
Now where is your mathematical formula for evolution? There is none because it is a mere second-order theory. i.e. Evolution is a philosophical belief, not a science. All science uses mathematical formulas. Evolution does not.
nature time minus god..... there happy?