3
1.
Peanut 11 year s ago
This long-time amateur astronomer thanks you from the bottom of her heart. Great post!
#8 & #24...Carl Sagan was the best.
#8 & #24...Carl Sagan was the best.
-1
4.
gigantes 11 year s ago
#5, it doesn't have anything to do with scale. it's about mass vs. space. the stellar object could be the size of a grape seed up to the size of the universe itself (whatever THAT is). if the relational threshold gets crossed, it gets crossed, okay? that's the catylyst-thingy-watchamacallit. so, in other words... watch your godammed grape seeds.
#30, yea yea yea... bla blah bla. well, MY species spent a vagrently-long amount of time there that will never be remotely measurable by earthly standards, and the RASPBERRIES AND RUM CAN GET TIRESOME, okay?
THE RASPBERRIES AND RUM CAN GET TIRESOME!
#34, glad at least one other westerner in the hemisphere figured this simple fact of existence out. new church, bro? :)
#30, yea yea yea... bla blah bla. well, MY species spent a vagrently-long amount of time there that will never be remotely measurable by earthly standards, and the RASPBERRIES AND RUM CAN GET TIRESOME, okay?
THE RASPBERRIES AND RUM CAN GET TIRESOME!
#34, glad at least one other westerner in the hemisphere figured this simple fact of existence out. new church, bro? :)
#8 & #24...Carl Sagan was the best.
Good post!
#30, yea yea yea... bla blah bla. well, MY species spent a vagrently-long amount of time there that will never be remotely measurable by earthly standards, and the RASPBERRIES AND RUM CAN GET TIRESOME, okay?
THE RASPBERRIES AND RUM CAN GET TIRESOME!
#34, glad at least one other westerner in the hemisphere figured this simple fact of existence out. new church, bro? :)
#20 dust you are and to dust you shall return
#30 how'd you figure? :)