Processing. Please wait...
X
Comments to #
1
All comments (10)
3
1.
Fenrisulven
11 year s ago
#9 I liked this one.
#21 Isn't this one still in the cinemas?
Reply
1
2.
hbmaciel
11 year s ago
#1 #3 #8 #9 #20
I like those.
Reply
1
3.
Whiskey_Drunk
11 year s ago
I don't get it #3 Waterworld made more then it cost. Budget, 175 million. Box office 264,218,220$
Reply
0
4.
Johny
11 year s ago
Exactly my thoughts. Why is it considered a disaster when it earned more than 50 % of the allocated budget?
I liked that final fantasy movie, too.
Reply
0
5.
Khysiek
11 year s ago
It did not covered costs of promotion.
Reply
0
6.
fish.b.head
11 year s ago
I saw a movie called "The Bone Ranger" in the 80's
Reply
0
7.
rikki_doxx
11 year s ago
I think Waterworld made 26 million on a budget of 175 million.
Reply
1
8.
bertha_2_2
11 year s ago
The asterisks are confusing. What are they representing?
Reply
0
9.
Khysiek
11 year s ago
#7 was quite good movie.
This numbers are wrong, according to IMDB - costs were 85mln., revenues - 59mln.
Other numbers seem also not quite right.
Reply
0
10.
jeskris
11 year s ago
#21 OT but who the fuck calls himself Armie Hammer????
Reply
random avatar
X
20 Years of Hollywood Box-Office Disasters That Failed Miserably
>
1
/
21
<
3
1.
Fenrisulven
11 year s ago
#9 I liked this one.
#21 Isn't this one still in the cinemas?
Reply
1
2.
hbmaciel
11 year s ago
#1 #3 #8 #9 #20
I like those.
Reply
1
3.
Whiskey_Drunk
11 year s ago
I don't get it #3 Waterworld made more then it cost. Budget, 175 million. Box office 264,218,220$
Reply
0
4.
Johny
11 year s ago
Exactly my thoughts. Why is it considered a disaster when it earned more than 50 % of the allocated budget?
I liked that final fantasy movie, too.
Reply
0
5.
Khysiek
11 year s ago
It did not covered costs of promotion.
Reply
0
6.
fish.b.head
11 year s ago
I saw a movie called "The Bone Ranger" in the 80's
Reply
0
7.
rikki_doxx
11 year s ago
I think Waterworld made 26 million on a budget of 175 million.
Reply
1
8.
bertha_2_2
11 year s ago
The asterisks are confusing. What are they representing?
Reply
0
9.
Khysiek
11 year s ago
#7 was quite good movie.
This numbers are wrong, according to IMDB - costs were 85mln., revenues - 59mln.
Other numbers seem also not quite right.
Reply
0
10.
jeskris
11 year s ago
#21 OT but who the fuck calls himself Armie Hammer????
Reply
random avatar
#21 Isn't this one still in the cinemas?
I like those.
I liked that final fantasy movie, too.
This numbers are wrong, according to IMDB - costs were 85mln., revenues - 59mln.
Other numbers seem also not quite right.