@izismile, thanks, appreciated. i don't really understand why a new design was needed in the first place, since you'd pretty much perfected the old one over the course of years.
i think if you were to ask people what the site really needed, most would say more fact-checking and reliable information. in particular, the short writeup that you add underneath the title of each post is often so inaccurate as to be ludicrous... for example the recent one about the inflatable mini-plane used to 'save the crews lives aboard crashing planes from WWII.' i mean, if you're not sure, then it's okay to say you're not sure. that's all.
@izismile, thanks, appreciated. i don't really understand why a new design was needed in the first place, since you'd pretty much perfected the old one over the course of years.
i think if you were to ask people what the site really needed, most would say more fact-checking and reliable information. in particular, the short writeup that you add underneath the title of each post is often so inaccurate as to be ludicrous... for example the recent one about the inflatable mini-plane used to 'save the crews lives aboard crashing planes from WWII.' i mean, if you're not sure, then it's okay to say you're not sure. that's all.
thanks, appreciated. i don't really understand why a new design was needed in the first place, since you'd pretty much perfected the old one over the course of years.
i think if you were to ask people what the site really needed, most would say more fact-checking and reliable information. in particular, the short writeup that you add underneath the title of each post is often so inaccurate as to be ludicrous... for example the recent one about the inflatable mini-plane used to 'save the crews lives aboard crashing planes from WWII.' i mean, if you're not sure, then it's okay to say you're not sure. that's all.
.