-1
1.
ArxFerrum 9 year s ago
Just in note in re two of the images here:
There is a quite difference between #1 and #3 - The former is clearly a very old structure and should not be desecrated... while the latter is in desperate need of the artistic decoration.
So-called 'street art' has a place but when the... um, artist, simply assumes the right to display on whim, it reduces from art to graffiti.
There is a quite difference between #1 and #3 - The former is clearly a very old structure and should not be desecrated... while the latter is in desperate need of the artistic decoration.
So-called 'street art' has a place but when the... um, artist, simply assumes the right to display on whim, it reduces from art to graffiti.
0
2.
williams.53 9 year s ago
what you talking about, man...? in Paris, artist are allowed to do street art after approval from city council and be left for an agreed period of time and must then wash away/clean up by the artist themselves after that... or face a fine...
0
4.
zwell7 9 year s ago
i saw n°5 every morning several months ago but it's gone now cuz it's not paint on the wall, it's just paper stick on it and the rain, days after days, unstick it from the wall...
There is a quite difference between #1 and #3 - The former is clearly a very old structure and should not be desecrated... while the latter is in desperate need of the artistic decoration.
So-called 'street art' has a place but when the... um, artist, simply assumes the right to display on whim, it reduces from art to graffiti.