'Attractive' in the sense of visual symmetry etc, and 'attractive' in the sense of desirability are two different things. These examples of 'attractiveness' are so symmetrical as to be mechanical. It's as if they are so symmetrical that they become inanimate.
On the other hand, some of the most beautiful gems in the world are the ones with the most remarkable 'flaws'. Some of the most influential works of art are those which broke the mold. And some of the most desirable women are the ones with the most natural, even unremarkable features.
Oh, and then there's the old adage: no matter how good they look, someone somewhere is sick and tired of their stuff.
'Attractive' in the sense of visual symmetry etc, and 'attractive' in the sense of desirability are two different things. These examples of 'attractiveness' are so symmetrical as to be mechanical. It's as if they are so symmetrical that they become inanimate.
On the other hand, some of the most beautiful gems in the world are the ones with the most remarkable 'flaws'. Some of the most influential works of art are those which broke the mold. And some of the most desirable women are the ones with the most natural, even unremarkable features.
Oh, and then there's the old adage: no matter how good they look, someone somewhere is sick and tired of their stuff.
On the other hand, some of the most beautiful gems in the world are the ones with the most remarkable 'flaws'. Some of the most influential works of art are those which broke the mold. And some of the most desirable women are the ones with the most natural, even unremarkable features.
Oh, and then there's the old adage: no matter how good they look, someone somewhere is sick and tired of their stuff.
these are self important libs and therefore bone ugly