This could be the most useless listicle I've ever seen. There is almost no food 'on the right' which I could eat, at least in those quantities. And I'm willing to bet most normal people couldn't eat them either.
It seems the point of the article is that, somehow, less caloric value makes a food better. Riiight...
This could be the most useless listicle I've ever seen. There is almost no food 'on the right' which I could eat, at least in those quantities. And I'm willing to bet most normal people couldn't eat them either.
It seems the point of the article is that, somehow, less caloric value makes a food better. Riiight...
0r
#3 same with the beans, you ever tried to eat 100g uncooked beans?
It seems the point of the article is that, somehow, less caloric value makes a food better. Riiight...