X
Comments to #2
All comments (1)
3
1.
Harmless 4 year s ago
If the Bond franchise moves forward with it's plan to replace Bond with a female, it will be the end of the franchise I predict. Most Bond fans are pretty picky about who plays Bond and tend to have started watching with the early films. As much as I have loved Daniel Craig as Bond, I feel the whole franchise lost something when it chose to completely remove all humor. The old films were cool, sexy and hilarious (especially Moore films) and this newest adaptation was just cold and brutal with zero humor, I mean not even an animal gag. I miss the old Bond!
He got his 007 status when he was 38
While the screen depiction of Bond has varied in age as the actors got older, his true age was never revealed. What is sacred, is that he’s a suave, older gentlemen with a particular set of skills. Hence the shock when a young Daniel Craig was cast to show Bond as a newly-minted 00 agent. Now, with No Time to Die on the horizon, we’ll get the older Bond.
In the books, however, Bond is revealed to be 38 in Casino Royale and he seems to stay in the late 30s/early 40’s range for all of Ian Fleming’s original novels. That’s a pretty good age.
3
1.
Harmless 4 year s ago
If the Bond franchise moves forward with it's plan to replace Bond with a female, it will be the end of the franchise I predict. Most Bond fans are pretty picky about who plays Bond and tend to have started watching with the early films. As much as I have loved Daniel Craig as Bond, I feel the whole franchise lost something when it chose to completely remove all humor. The old films were cool, sexy and hilarious (especially Moore films) and this newest adaptation was just cold and brutal with zero humor, I mean not even an animal gag. I miss the old Bond!