5
1.
Madge 4 year s ago
Most of these are pretty dumb. ASAP is not aggressive you ninny it is efficient. It is amazingly easy to start a camp fire if you know what you're doing and have some dry tinder. Half of these sound like they were written by an "indoor" person.
0
2.
Veda 4 year s ago
Madge, or even enough wet birch bark - absolutely agree.
-2
3.
ZombieDarwin 4 year s ago
#7 I'd love to hear the "rationale" behind that reasoning, but I'm sure it's just going to be ravings from an ignorant dolt.
2
4.
Joan 4 year s ago
ZombieDarwin, 90's, 00's, 10's, 20's. Four decades.
0
5.
Don 4 year s ago
Joan,
Um, no. Only dolts count that way. As I explained elsewhere, whenever you count in decades, the first year always ends in 1, and the last year always --always!-- ends in 0. Thus, the first decade started in 1991, and ended at the end of 2000. The second decade then started (2001), and ended at the end of 2010. The third decade then started (2011), and will end at the end of this year (2020).
For those of you who are slow, that's THREE decades. Not four. Three. Anyone who tells you anything other than that is an ignorant dolt.
Um, no. Only dolts count that way. As I explained elsewhere, whenever you count in decades, the first year always ends in 1, and the last year always --always!-- ends in 0. Thus, the first decade started in 1991, and ended at the end of 2000. The second decade then started (2001), and ended at the end of 2010. The third decade then started (2011), and will end at the end of this year (2020).
For those of you who are slow, that's THREE decades. Not four. Three. Anyone who tells you anything other than that is an ignorant dolt.
0
6.
Joan 4 year s ago
ZombieDarwin, also: the use of double quotation marks for emphasis, as you used on the word 'rationale', is not considered correct punctuation in any source I with which I'm familiar. Conventionally, it's been single marks; more currently, asterisks are used. Normally, I would not correct someone in informal communication such as this, but I thought you'd want to know, given your penchant for correctness. Jus sayin.
0
7.
ZombieDarwin 4 year s ago
Joan,
I'm sorry, I don't take grammar advice from someone who can't spell. And if you think that double quotation marks are not used for emphasis, then you're an even bigger dolt than you were before.
Toodles!
I'm sorry, I don't take grammar advice from someone who can't spell. And if you think that double quotation marks are not used for emphasis, then you're an even bigger dolt than you were before.
Toodles!
0
8.
Allen 4 year s ago
#17 the real difference is in movies, you can see ghosts, but in reality, you can only see optical illusions or hallucinations
0
9.
Jahoda 4 year s ago
The vacume cleaner is usually the dirtiest item
Um, no. Only dolts count that way. As I explained elsewhere, whenever you count in decades, the first year always ends in 1, and the last year always --always!-- ends in 0. Thus, the first decade started in 1991, and ended at the end of 2000. The second decade then started (2001), and ended at the end of 2010. The third decade then started (2011), and will end at the end of this year (2020).
For those of you who are slow, that's THREE decades. Not four. Three. Anyone who tells you anything other than that is an ignorant dolt.
I'm sorry, I don't take grammar advice from someone who can't spell. And if you think that double quotation marks are not used for emphasis, then you're an even bigger dolt than you were before.
Toodles!