Processing. Please wait...
X
Comments to #
1
All comments (10)
-1
1.
Millie
4 year s ago
#4 No, what?
Reply
1
2.
Squat
4 year s ago
Millie
,the number 4 should be lV not llll
Reply
11
3.
Elvira
4 year s ago
Squat
,
actualy it is correct to use IIII instead of IV on clocks
Reply
3
4.
Caleb
4 year s ago
Elvira
,
second that
Reply
3
5.
Harold
4 year s ago
Elvira
,
Yup. Actually called a "clockmaker's four"
Reply
-1
6.
Claire
4 year s ago
Quote: Harold
clockmaker's four
Huh, TIL
Reply
2
7.
Ry
4 year s ago
#16 Why? Thats bad @$$. Cool 50s style.
Reply
2
8.
Antonia
4 year s ago
Ry
,I so agree
Reply
2
9.
Ote
4 year s ago
#1 made me throw up in my mouth a little...
Reply
-1
10.
Mandy
4 year s ago
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Reply
random avatar
X
No, No, And One More No
>
1
/
31
<
-1
1.
Millie
4 year s ago
#4 No, what?
Reply
1
2.
Squat
4 year s ago
Millie
,the number 4 should be lV not llll
Reply
11
3.
Elvira
4 year s ago
Squat
,
actualy it is correct to use IIII instead of IV on clocks
Reply
3
4.
Caleb
4 year s ago
Elvira
,
second that
Reply
3
5.
Harold
4 year s ago
Elvira
,
Yup. Actually called a "clockmaker's four"
Reply
-1
6.
Claire
4 year s ago
Quote: Harold
clockmaker's four
Huh, TIL
Reply
2
7.
Ry
4 year s ago
#16 Why? Thats bad @$$. Cool 50s style.
Reply
2
8.
Antonia
4 year s ago
Ry
,I so agree
Reply
2
9.
Ote
4 year s ago
#1 made me throw up in my mouth a little...
Reply
-1
10.
Mandy
4 year s ago
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Reply
random avatar
actualy it is correct to use IIII instead of IV on clocks
second that
Yup. Actually called a "clockmaker's four"
Huh, TIL