X
Comments to #24
All comments (3)
2
1.
Liza 4 year s ago
#24 so does sperm
5
2.
Dobbin 4 year s ago
#23, no Polaroid was not referring to shaking the camera, they were warning against shaking the resulting instant photograph. Shaking the photo did not make the image appear faster and often caused the image to be damaged.
0
3.
Syl 4 year s ago
The typeface used in these images is really harsh on the eyes. 
2
1.
Liza 4 year s ago
#24 so does sperm
5
2.
Dobbin 4 year s ago
#23, no Polaroid was not referring to shaking the camera, they were warning against shaking the resulting instant photograph. Shaking the photo did not make the image appear faster and often caused the image to be damaged.
0
3.
Syl 4 year s ago
The typeface used in these images is really harsh on the eyes.