X
-8
1.
Drew 3 year s ago
All those movies are terrible.
       
0
2.
Candace 3 year s ago
Drew, Valerian was okay-ish. But agreed.
       
-2
3.
Josey 3 year s ago
Drew,
oh dear.. i just realized you are right....
       
3
4.
Joanna 3 year s ago
#13 Based on Phillip Pullmans Trilogy "His Dark Materials." It's more (and openly) anti Catholic Church rather than anti-Christian. This was a good film and the series is good too. Reminds me, I must re-watch Ken Russell's "The Devils."
       
5
5.
Dosia 3 year s ago
The first Pacific Rim was great the second, terrible as f@#k
       
0
6.
Greg 3 year s ago
Dosia,

John Boyega is not as great as he thinks he is.
       
2
7.
Valerie 3 year s ago
In Time is quite a good movie. Definitly underrated.
       
2
8.
Roberta 3 year s ago
well these movies pander to the chinese which never do well in the US.
       
-2
9.
Nick 3 year s ago
Just another proof that non americans have a better taste dance3
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

About Time (2013)

US Box Office: $15,323,921

International Box Office: $73,214,821

Yes, this was a British production, but writer/director Richard Curtis had a massive track record in North America with smash hits like Notting Hill and Love Actually. Maybe the problem was a lack of stars outside of Rachel McAdams? Interestingly, while the movie did better in the UK (as expected), it was a massive hit in South Korea.

 

X
Movies That Weren’t Successful In The US But Made Bank In The Rest Of The World
>
6/20
<