X
-8
1.
Drew 2 year s ago
All those movies are terrible.
       
0
2.
Candace 2 year s ago
Drew, Valerian was okay-ish. But agreed.
       
-2
3.
Josey 2 year s ago
Drew,
oh dear.. i just realized you are right....
       
3
4.
Joanna 2 year s ago
#13 Based on Phillip Pullmans Trilogy "His Dark Materials." It's more (and openly) anti Catholic Church rather than anti-Christian. This was a good film and the series is good too. Reminds me, I must re-watch Ken Russell's "The Devils."
       
5
5.
Dosia 2 year s ago
The first Pacific Rim was great the second, terrible as [email protected]#k
       
0
6.
Greg 2 year s ago
Dosia,

John Boyega is not as great as he thinks he is.
       
2
7.
Valerie 2 year s ago
In Time is quite a good movie. Definitly underrated.
       
2
8.
Roberta 2 year s ago
well these movies pander to the chinese which never do well in the US.
       
-2
9.
Nick 2 year s ago
Just another proof that non americans have a better taste dance3
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

Gulliver’s Travels (2010)

US Box Office: $42,779,261

International Box Office: $189,238,587

Like a lot of the films on this list, Gulliver’s Travels got bad reviews. One of the criticisms was an over-reliance on special effects, which, ironically enough, might help explain the film’s success overseas, as quality special effects are something that don’t get lost in translation. The fact it was based on a classic of English literature probably helped it do well in the UK and Australia, as well other parts of Europe, too.

 

X
Movies That Weren’t Successful In The US But Made Bank In The Rest Of The World
>
8/20
<