There is a vast difference between noting that clothing options differed for genders throughout history (dresses, kilts, tunics, etc for men) and any implication that it was because we had different opinions on gender in general. Today we aren’t arguing whether men can wear dresses, but whether wearing one makes you a woman.
Regardless of how they dressed, men were still men and women were women. No one in those old photos and paintings with dangly bits was pretending to be woman of the year.
My mother always told me that it was totally common for kids wearing 'unisex' dresses until age of like 6-8. Not long ago many child's died through 1001 different reasons before aging and f** really nobody cared about until now so they can sell more sh**.
There is a vast difference between noting that clothing options differed for genders throughout history (dresses, kilts, tunics, etc for men) and any implication that it was because we had different opinions on gender in general. Today we aren’t arguing whether men can wear dresses, but whether wearing one makes you a woman.
Regardless of how they dressed, men were still men and women were women. No one in those old photos and paintings with dangly bits was pretending to be woman of the year.
My mother always told me that it was totally common for kids wearing 'unisex' dresses until age of like 6-8. Not long ago many child's died through 1001 different reasons before aging and f** really nobody cared about until now so they can sell more sh**.
He literally said that
Grabbing unrelated snippets from bizarre sources does not prove his agendized point.
Total fail
Today we aren’t arguing whether men can wear dresses, but whether wearing one makes you a woman.
re: Gender
An apple is NOT an orange.
Sane person: that's a kilt kid. Go read a book for once in your life.
Because that stuff is more interesting and educational than guns and cars
You made my day.