4
1.
Tash 2 year s ago
#16 I do not consider this type of painting "art". Sorry. It's something a 4 year old can do. It takes NO skill and minimal effort. These Pollock, Rothko, and the person mentioned in #16 are "artists" that are in the section of money laundering through the art world
0
2.
Brose 2 year s ago
Tash,
I agree with most of that, except Pollock. Pollock’s paintings are awesome.
I agree with most of that, except Pollock. Pollock’s paintings are awesome.
-4
3.
Ophi 2 year s ago
just because you dont like it or understand it does not mean it is the same as a 4 y old could do. it is way more complicated than it looks, consistance, thicknest and paint weight are all things tto consider. plus color complement.... i done some more regular painting and accidental art is an harder to master than it looks.
9
4.
Daisy 2 year s ago
Ophi,
Oh here comes the "you don't understand it" crowd. Here is the reality; Pollock lucked in by convincing some pretentious art world people that this was serious. The whole art world is rife with money laundering with "artists" who can barely draw a form and have convinced the unwashed that if you don't like it, it's because you're not smart enough to understand it. What a bunch of pretentious bullsh#t.
Oh here comes the "you don't understand it" crowd. Here is the reality; Pollock lucked in by convincing some pretentious art world people that this was serious. The whole art world is rife with money laundering with "artists" who can barely draw a form and have convinced the unwashed that if you don't like it, it's because you're not smart enough to understand it. What a bunch of pretentious bullsh#t.
0
5.
Jody 2 year s ago
Daisy,
Down with "Big Art!"
Down with "Big Art!"
1
6.
Aleva 2 year s ago
Only human beings can get into an argument about art...
-2
7.
Deborah 2 year s ago
To each their own - try to keep yours to yourself- please.
I agree with most of that, except Pollock. Pollock’s paintings are awesome.
Oh here comes the "you don't understand it" crowd. Here is the reality; Pollock lucked in by convincing some pretentious art world people that this was serious. The whole art world is rife with money laundering with "artists" who can barely draw a form and have convinced the unwashed that if you don't like it, it's because you're not smart enough to understand it. What a bunch of pretentious bullsh#t.
Down with "Big Art!"