X
Comments to #21
All comments (8)
0
1.
Stacia 3 year s ago
wtf most of these don't even look like they are in the same family let alone mirror images
0
2.
Hop 3 year s ago
Stacia, i can't agree more. Sometimes people see what they wanna see.
-1
3.
Tony 3 year s ago
1
4.
Hephsibah 3 year s ago
a list of people who have 1 or two that resemble each other fairly strong, many who look vaguely alike (likely no more than randomly chosen people of same basic background/lineage would look), and the rest look nothing like each other.
1
5.
Jos 3 year s ago
#17 They aren’t unattractive, but “so beautiful” is a stretch.
4
6.
Corinne 3 year s ago
#3 #15 are closest in my opinion.
0
7.
Myrtle 3 year s ago
#16 should not be in this post.
2
8.
Elbertson 3 year s ago
So none are identical, as in identical twins, but that is not the title of the post. The similarities and nuances are most certainly there in most of these. Obviously related for the best part
Bonus: "Princess Charlotte and Queen Elizabeth might not look alike, but the princess is surely the queen’s mini-me."
0
1.
Stacia 3 year s ago
wtf most of these don't even look like they are in the same family let alone mirror images
0
2.
Hop 3 year s ago
Stacia, i can't agree more. Sometimes people see what they wanna see.
-1
3.
Tony 3 year s ago
1
4.
Hephsibah 3 year s ago
a list of people who have 1 or two that resemble each other fairly strong, many who look vaguely alike (likely no more than randomly chosen people of same basic background/lineage would look), and the rest look nothing like each other.
1
5.
Jos 3 year s ago
#17 They aren’t unattractive, but “so beautiful” is a stretch.
4
6.
Corinne 3 year s ago
#3 #15 are closest in my opinion.
0
7.
Myrtle 3 year s ago
#16 should not be in this post.
2
8.
Elbertson 3 year s ago
So none are identical, as in identical twins, but that is not the title of the post. The similarities and nuances are most certainly there in most of these. Obviously related for the best part