X
7
1.
Lazar 1 week ago
#31 I mean, you can literally see the driver of the transport vehicle in the picture.
       
6
2.
Shelly 1 week ago
Lazar,

Only because the vehicle is autonomous, it doesn't mean it has to be lonely.
       
3
3.
Serilla 1 week ago
#41 ist a funny and sweet idea ... until someone eventually gonna hit a passing bike or car with his feet.
       
3
4.
Phenie 1 week ago
50 is boring
       
-9
5.
Oswald 1 week ago
Almost managed to be cat-free here. Come on, Izi, you can do it!
       
-2
6.
Unice 1 week ago
#50 taxes on jet fuel would save ... no: gain a lot more dollars
       
-1
7.
Unice 1 week ago
Unice,
ups #31 of course
       
-1
8.
Newton 1 week ago
Unice,

They should tax them 90%, then the poor would be rich.
       
1
9.
Iona 1 week ago
#2 Entertainment center - AM/FM radio and television.
       
1
10.
Eliphalet 1 week ago
#35
5.) bonus, if own head is used...
       
-1
11.
Eliphalet 1 week ago
Eliphalet,

#36 - where is my sign?
       
5
12.
Ed 1 week ago
#31 I love to see innovation, but they certainly aren't saving $35 million per flight.
       
0
13.
Renius 1 week ago
Ed,
I called BS to the amount... perhaps over a whole year of daily flights, but definitely not ONE flight.
       
0
14.
Tine 1 week ago
Renius, it can be read in two ways, but it obviously means "(35M USD) and (213 litres of fuel on each flight)", not "(35M USD and 213 litres of fuel on each flight)". :-)
       
2
15.
Newton 1 week ago
#23 Will be a great catch for the lucky fish husband
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot
X
Morning Picdump
>
1/54
<

Advertisement