X
9
1.
Lazar 2 year s ago
#31 I mean, you can literally see the driver of the transport vehicle in the picture.
       
6
2.
Shelly 2 year s ago
Lazar,

Only because the vehicle is autonomous, it doesn't mean it has to be lonely.
       
0
3.
Jeanne 2 year s ago
Lazar,

and then there is the fact that aircraft engines need to run for some time before take-off.
       
3
4.
Serilla 2 year s ago
#41 ist a funny and sweet idea ... until someone eventually gonna hit a passing bike or car with his feet.
       
3
5.
Phenie 2 year s ago
50 is boring
       
-9
6.
Oswald 2 year s ago
Almost managed to be cat-free here. Come on, Izi, you can do it!
       
-2
7.
Unice 2 year s ago
#50 taxes on jet fuel would save ... no: gain a lot more dollars
       
-2
8.
Unice 2 year s ago
Unice,
ups #31 of course
       
0
9.
Newton 2 year s ago
Unice,

They should tax them 90%, then the poor would be rich.
       
1
10.
Iona 2 year s ago
#2 Entertainment center - AM/FM radio and television.
       
1
11.
Eliphalet 2 year s ago
#35
5.) bonus, if own head is used...
       
0
12.
Eliphalet 2 year s ago
Eliphalet,

#36 - where is my sign?
       
5
13.
Ed 2 year s ago
#31 I love to see innovation, but they certainly aren't saving $35 million per flight.
       
1
14.
Renius 2 year s ago
Ed,
I called BS to the amount... perhaps over a whole year of daily flights, but definitely not ONE flight.
       
-1
15.
Tine 2 year s ago
Renius, it can be read in two ways, but it obviously means "(35M USD) and (213 litres of fuel on each flight)", not "(35M USD and 213 litres of fuel on each flight)". :-)
       
1
16.
Newton 2 year s ago
#23 Will be a great catch for the lucky fish husband
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot
X
Morning Picdump
>
20/54
<