a) it looks like that because you forgot to add a thickness of a glass wall (look at the top rim of a glass above that)... that line is the inner surface of the glass cup
b) however i agree is a photoshop, because its not properly masked (that blurry backround around the lower left corner...
#27 - I believe that is a man named Clyde Peeling, from Allenwood PA - owner of a reptile zoo named Reptileland. He gave demonstrations in schools all over PA and beyond. He was at my school in Muncy PA more than once when I was there in the 70s.
#43 - 6,250 people live there ! But how high above sea level is it ? 95% of the world's people use, and think in, metric. Are you writing for the 5% that still use Imperial measures, you know, the ones based on an English king's body parts and very old fashioned customs. Chains, furlongs, leagues, feet, fathoms, knots, yards, miles, inches. The WORLD WIDE web, remember.
Augustina, since you seem to despise "old fashioned customs", let's try something new. How about the world uses the measurement system of the only country having the engineering achievement of putting a man on the moon? Doen't that seem ... fitting?
Greenberry, I can assure you that the people who put a man on the moon certainly understand and used the metric system. That argument is getting so old.
Greenberry, Many of NASA's key people were ex Nazi engineers and scientists who also built the V2s that landed in the UK. They worked in metric on both projects.
The only reason America had the first man on the moon was because Russia had the first man in space. It was just one big d@#k waving contest to "prove" which country was "better". Like if a few people did something amazing it "proves" the whole country and it's people are better... somehow. Kinda what you're trying to do now.
We just don't want to swap our arbitrary units for ones based on the meridian through Paris, France because that is SO rational. Seriously, the Imperial system is binary and relates mass to volume, which the metric system does not. Basically, the Imperial system is easy to use and practical for building things.
a) it looks like that because you forgot to add a thickness of a glass wall (look at the top rim of a glass above that)... that line is the inner surface of the glass cup
b) however i agree is a photoshop, because its not properly masked (that blurry backround around the lower left corner...
#27 - I believe that is a man named Clyde Peeling, from Allenwood PA - owner of a reptile zoo named Reptileland. He gave demonstrations in schools all over PA and beyond. He was at my school in Muncy PA more than once when I was there in the 70s.
#43 - 6,250 people live there ! But how high above sea level is it ? 95% of the world's people use, and think in, metric. Are you writing for the 5% that still use Imperial measures, you know, the ones based on an English king's body parts and very old fashioned customs. Chains, furlongs, leagues, feet, fathoms, knots, yards, miles, inches. The WORLD WIDE web, remember.
Augustina, since you seem to despise "old fashioned customs", let's try something new. How about the world uses the measurement system of the only country having the engineering achievement of putting a man on the moon? Doen't that seem ... fitting?
Greenberry, I can assure you that the people who put a man on the moon certainly understand and used the metric system. That argument is getting so old.
Greenberry, Many of NASA's key people were ex Nazi engineers and scientists who also built the V2s that landed in the UK. They worked in metric on both projects.
The only reason America had the first man on the moon was because Russia had the first man in space. It was just one big d@#k waving contest to "prove" which country was "better". Like if a few people did something amazing it "proves" the whole country and it's people are better... somehow. Kinda what you're trying to do now.
We just don't want to swap our arbitrary units for ones based on the meridian through Paris, France because that is SO rational. Seriously, the Imperial system is binary and relates mass to volume, which the metric system does not. Basically, the Imperial system is easy to use and practical for building things.
Be kind to each other.
#41
right? im like WTF just take a glass, pour a water in it and take a look...
At a first look you can see the house layer is larger than the glass in the upper-left corner of the glass
a) it looks like that because you forgot to add a thickness of a glass wall (look at the top rim of a glass above that)... that line is the inner surface of the glass cup
b) however i agree is a photoshop, because its not properly masked (that blurry backround around the lower left corner...
Chains, furlongs, leagues, feet, fathoms, knots, yards, miles, inches.
The WORLD WIDE web, remember.
I can assure you that the people who put a man on the moon certainly understand and used the metric system. That argument is getting so old.
Sounds like something a person living in a country that didn’t put a man on the moon would write.
The only reason America had the first man on the moon was because Russia had the first man in space. It was just one big d@#k waving contest to "prove" which country was "better". Like if a few people did something amazing it "proves" the whole country and it's people are better... somehow. Kinda what you're trying to do now.
We just don't want to swap our arbitrary units for ones based on the meridian through Paris, France because that is SO rational.
Seriously, the Imperial system is binary and relates mass to volume, which the metric system does not. Basically, the Imperial system is easy to use and practical for building things.
Omg. Shut. UP!
The peoples were smarter those days. Not risking their lives for an Instagram shot.
F@#k this warmonger and alcoholic.
Didn't realize there were still pro-Nazi people out there...
49% of Merica is.
39% Thank you
F off commie.