0
1.
Viv 2 year s ago
#12
If that's true it definitely sounds like the origin story of a superhero (or possibly antihero)
If that's true it definitely sounds like the origin story of a superhero (or possibly antihero)
1
2.
Woody 2 year s ago
#1 I could be wrong, but animal leathr is a by-product of the meat industry. So, vegans would be happy killing plants over animals, but I see both as living creatures, and would mean more souls lost as a replacement for one.
-3
3.
Stephen 2 year s ago
Woody,
'byproduct' is a misnomer.
Your perspective on fictitious things (souls) doesn't matter. According to legislation and governance systems, generally applied globally, food plants and food animals are different things under the super-ground of 'agricultural products'.
'byproduct' is a misnomer.
Your perspective on fictitious things (souls) doesn't matter. According to legislation and governance systems, generally applied globally, food plants and food animals are different things under the super-ground of 'agricultural products'.
0
4.
Woody 2 year s ago
#24 So, all the birds who use bright flowers and stones in nests, and the oragutangs who wear grass "hats", and the deer who wrap antlers in moss and twigs... none of those count as "fashion"? How did "scientists" miss fahiom before?
-10
5.
Shaina 2 year s ago
Woody,
How about you shut the fuck up and stop speaking above your own intelligence level. Asking rhetorical questions is neanderthal-level philosophy at best.
How about you shut the fuck up and stop speaking above your own intelligence level. Asking rhetorical questions is neanderthal-level philosophy at best.
1
6.
Maureen 2 year s ago
Shaina,
neanderthals were pretty much Homo sapiens equals in terms of intelligence...Great points from Woody, why don't you STFU?
neanderthals were pretty much Homo sapiens equals in terms of intelligence...Great points from Woody, why don't you STFU?
0
7.
Shaina 2 year s ago
Maureen,I'm going to find you and eat you.
Neanderthals were not equal to home sapient in intelligence. They had smaller frontal lobes, and therefor fewer reasoning capabilities and reduced deductive reasoning.
Stuff it.
Neanderthals were not equal to home sapient in intelligence. They had smaller frontal lobes, and therefor fewer reasoning capabilities and reduced deductive reasoning.
Stuff it.
1
8.
Woody 2 year s ago
#30 I've said this before. It's only TWO possible days, not three. So either you are in today/tomorow, OR yesterday/today, depending on your original time zone. There is no third day. Stop making people stupid.
0
9.
Junie 2 year s ago
Woody,
I think they wanted to say you step from today into yesterday and back in yesterdays tomorrow, that is the day you started.
I think they wanted to say you step from today into yesterday and back in yesterdays tomorrow, that is the day you started.
If that's true it definitely sounds like the origin story of a superhero (or possibly antihero)
'byproduct' is a misnomer.
Your perspective on fictitious things (souls) doesn't matter. According to legislation and governance systems, generally applied globally, food plants and food animals are different things under the super-ground of 'agricultural products'.
How about you shut the fuck up and stop speaking above your own intelligence level. Asking rhetorical questions is neanderthal-level philosophy at best.
neanderthals were pretty much Homo sapiens equals in terms of intelligence...Great points from Woody, why don't you STFU?
Neanderthals were not equal to home sapient in intelligence. They had smaller frontal lobes, and therefor fewer reasoning capabilities and reduced deductive reasoning.
Stuff it.
I think they wanted to say you step from today into yesterday and back in yesterdays tomorrow, that is the day you started.