X
4
1.
Deborah 4 month s ago
#14 Something tells me the book wasn't much better.
       
1
2.
Lina 4 month s ago
#7 Disagree, with respect. The Hobbit was the only book treated well in the three-episode movie, if only for how much of the book was included. The original LOTR series (3 books, one movie each) was a truncated version of the trilogy, leaving out major characters and activities in the interest of doing each book in one go.
My impression is that you either (1) have not read the 4 books or (2) Read the Hobbit and didn't care for it.
Personally, I would have liked all the movies to have been at least 3 parters.
       
-2
3.
Midge 4 month s ago
Lina,
the 2 towers was literally walking for hours. book or movie, it s#cks.
       
1
4.
Rosabel 4 month s ago
#9 girl_cray No explanation needed for loyal fans of the books.
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

"Eragon. All-star cast, zero [email protected]#ks given about the series. Could’ve been great if they had actually stuck with the literary plot."

 

X
Some Of The Worst Movies That Were Based On Books
>
1/16
<