4
1.
Deborah 2 year s ago
#14 Something tells me the book wasn't much better.
1
2.
Lina 2 year s ago
#7 Disagree, with respect. The Hobbit was the only book treated well in the three-episode movie, if only for how much of the book was included. The original LOTR series (3 books, one movie each) was a truncated version of the trilogy, leaving out major characters and activities in the interest of doing each book in one go.
My impression is that you either (1) have not read the 4 books or (2) Read the Hobbit and didn't care for it.
Personally, I would have liked all the movies to have been at least 3 parters.
My impression is that you either (1) have not read the 4 books or (2) Read the Hobbit and didn't care for it.
Personally, I would have liked all the movies to have been at least 3 parters.
-2
3.
Midge 2 year s ago
Lina,
the 2 towers was literally walking for hours. book or movie, it s#cks.
the 2 towers was literally walking for hours. book or movie, it s#cks.
2
4.
Rosabel 2 year s ago
#9 
No explanation needed for loyal fans of the books.
No explanation needed for loyal fans of the books.
My impression is that you either (1) have not read the 4 books or (2) Read the Hobbit and didn't care for it.
Personally, I would have liked all the movies to have been at least 3 parters.
the 2 towers was literally walking for hours. book or movie, it s#cks.