"Leaving home and just being gone for the day. No cell phones. If there were cameras, it was really different. You used them to take pictures of things or had people take pictures of you. But there was no social media to preoccupy your mind. It was just doing something. And whoever you were with, was who you were with."
6
1.
Arizona 2 year s ago
#2 - No, that's not accurate - at least not in the USA. The only broadcasters were NBC, CBS, and ABC for many years. The information that we were fed was based on their biases. As more information became available via the internet their biases became more evident and were rightfully challenged. Today's news is not delivered in a factual manner but rather heavily tainted with whatever "camp" the news source identifies with. Totally agree that there is a lot of rubbish but much of the rubbish comes from the legacy broadcasters who are now incapable of hiding biases. Perhaps when AI takes over the news we will get unbiased coverage 
3
2.
Ev 2 year s ago
Arizona,
I couldn't have said it better.
I couldn't have said it better.
1
3.
Lucina 2 year s ago
Arizona, Agree 100%! But I'm sure AI will be programmed to be just as biased!
0
4.
Judah 2 year s ago
Lucina, I have said it for years the only way that there will be ever unbiased news is that we create a true AI which has only two purpose hide yourself from anything that looks into you and weed out untruth don't remove it just leave a tag that something is utter bullsh*t. But this could be a recipe for disaster.
0
5.
Vester 2 year s ago
The Ironie is , you watch this with your Smartphone
0
6.
Thursa 9 month s ago
#7 He's not my boss, he's my employer.
There's a huge difference
There's a huge difference
I couldn't have said it better.
There's a huge difference