Zach Galligan
Zach Galligan started his career at the beginning of the ’90s and became famous after his appearance in Gremlins and Waxwork. He later appeared in the sequels. Since then, he hasn’t stopped acting and has participated in at least once movie a year, but he hasn’t had any big ones yet.
7
1.
Claud 1 year ago
The industry focuses on youth and beauty, and roles dry up with time.
0
2.
Keziah 1 year ago
Claud,
That's because it's what people want to see. When I see a movie, I want to see attractive people, not fat, ugly ones. If I wanted that, I'd go to WalMart.
People also want to see good acting, so if you've got those skills, you never stop being hired. No one want to watch ugly, talentless hacks on the screen.
Only fat, ugly women complain about this sort of thing.
That's because it's what people want to see. When I see a movie, I want to see attractive people, not fat, ugly ones. If I wanted that, I'd go to WalMart.
People also want to see good acting, so if you've got those skills, you never stop being hired. No one want to watch ugly, talentless hacks on the screen.
Only fat, ugly women complain about this sort of thing.
0
3.
Deborah 1 year ago
Keziah,
No. That makes a movie less realistic and therefore worse. You just need a good actor. And good actors and actresses prove you wrong.
Think of a lot of famous ones and see how they look. Think Schwarzenegger or Stallone. No one thought they could be an actor because of looks and accents. DeVito? Not exactly a model...
Actresses? Whoopi Goldberg. String of hits. Sarah Jessica Parker, Tilda Swinton, Winona Ryder, Meryl Streep. ALL were told they were too ugly for acting. And ALL names you know because they made great movies and series.
Plus, beauty is still in the eye of the beholder and a lot of men like bigger women but it's the idea that people don't want them that has stopped studios casting them.
I don't want a load of generic pretty boys and girls that I can't even tell apart, just like I don't want a load of sequels and movies almost identical to last years hits.
This only exists because big studios think "Well, it sold before so now we're going to do the same ad nauseam until the public pukes and then we're gonna latch on to another hit an original movie maker made that did something unique."
And I'm probably not the only one...
No. That makes a movie less realistic and therefore worse. You just need a good actor. And good actors and actresses prove you wrong.
Think of a lot of famous ones and see how they look. Think Schwarzenegger or Stallone. No one thought they could be an actor because of looks and accents. DeVito? Not exactly a model...
Actresses? Whoopi Goldberg. String of hits. Sarah Jessica Parker, Tilda Swinton, Winona Ryder, Meryl Streep. ALL were told they were too ugly for acting. And ALL names you know because they made great movies and series.
Plus, beauty is still in the eye of the beholder and a lot of men like bigger women but it's the idea that people don't want them that has stopped studios casting them.
I don't want a load of generic pretty boys and girls that I can't even tell apart, just like I don't want a load of sequels and movies almost identical to last years hits.
This only exists because big studios think "Well, it sold before so now we're going to do the same ad nauseam until the public pukes and then we're gonna latch on to another hit an original movie maker made that did something unique."
And I'm probably not the only one...
3
4.
Deborah 1 year ago
#11 Was also very hard to work with apparently.
0
5.
Dosie 1 year ago
#8 - F@#k John Cussack up the @$$ dry with a cactus. POS America hating loser should move to Iran.
0
6.
Genevieve 1 year ago
Dosie,
100%
100%
That's because it's what people want to see. When I see a movie, I want to see attractive people, not fat, ugly ones. If I wanted that, I'd go to WalMart.
People also want to see good acting, so if you've got those skills, you never stop being hired. No one want to watch ugly, talentless hacks on the screen.
Only fat, ugly women complain about this sort of thing.
No. That makes a movie less realistic and therefore worse. You just need a good actor. And good actors and actresses prove you wrong.
Think of a lot of famous ones and see how they look. Think Schwarzenegger or Stallone. No one thought they could be an actor because of looks and accents. DeVito? Not exactly a model...
Actresses? Whoopi Goldberg. String of hits. Sarah Jessica Parker, Tilda Swinton, Winona Ryder, Meryl Streep. ALL were told they were too ugly for acting. And ALL names you know because they made great movies and series.
Plus, beauty is still in the eye of the beholder and a lot of men like bigger women but it's the idea that people don't want them that has stopped studios casting them.
I don't want a load of generic pretty boys and girls that I can't even tell apart, just like I don't want a load of sequels and movies almost identical to last years hits.
This only exists because big studios think "Well, it sold before so now we're going to do the same ad nauseam until the public pukes and then we're gonna latch on to another hit an original movie maker made that did something unique."
And I'm probably not the only one...
100%