2
1.
Penelope 2 year s ago
#9 and they made a lot less money back then, too you disrespectful ignoramous
1
2.
Chick 2 year s ago
Penelope,
That person has no idea what they're talking about, but there was definitely a better housing market back then.
That person has no idea what they're talking about, but there was definitely a better housing market back then.
1
3.
Tim 2 year s ago
Penelope,
Housing costs have far exceeded growth in wages — the median house of 1960 would cost just $104,619 in 2020 dollars, far below the actual cost of $240,500, meaning housing costs have increased by 229%. Median household income has only grown by 140% in that same time period, from $49,232 (2020 dollars) in 1960 to $68,703 today.
Housing costs have far exceeded growth in wages — the median house of 1960 would cost just $104,619 in 2020 dollars, far below the actual cost of $240,500, meaning housing costs have increased by 229%. Median household income has only grown by 140% in that same time period, from $49,232 (2020 dollars) in 1960 to $68,703 today.
0
4.
Deanne 2 year s ago
#28? I get the cheering after someone breaks a glass, but why "wayyyyy?"
I also don't get #35 (or #37 :p)
I also don't get #35 (or #37 :p)
1
5.
Nancy 2 year s ago
#4 that is not a cemetery, it is a graveyard. A cemetery is not attached to a church it is in a separate area away from the church. A graveyard is attached to a church.
That person has no idea what they're talking about, but there was definitely a better housing market back then.
Housing costs have far exceeded growth in wages — the median house of 1960 would cost just $104,619 in 2020 dollars, far below the actual cost of $240,500, meaning housing costs have increased by 229%. Median household income has only grown by 140% in that same time period, from $49,232 (2020 dollars) in 1960 to $68,703 today.
I also don't get #35 (or #37 :p)