X
-1
1.
Fie 2 month s ago
#8
Nazgul are fictional characters? Really?
dash
       
-3
2.
Kenji 2 month s ago
Nazgul are the creatures not the riders.
       
0
3.
Becky 2 month s ago
Quote: Kenji
Nazgûl
Your nerd is weak.Stick to Star Wars.
       
4
4.
Adam 2 month s ago
Tolkien paid very little attention to describing any details of the appearances of characters. The Balrog, for example, was only described as a menacing creature shrouded in fire, darkness and shadow. That's it.
Some characters, like Tom Bombadil and Gandalf were described in a little more detail, and to that effect, #1 is so far off as to be offensive.
Really, all of these are terrible. Why the heck does Frodo have face tattoos?? This "artist" s#cks.
       
4
5.
Louis 2 month s ago
What's with all the detail in Gimli's face, and Aragorn's looks smooth as a baby's bottom? It almost looks unfinished
       
0
6.
Wesley 1 month ago
Louis,

The "artist" had to upgrade and reboot halfway through.
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

Gandalf

X
Digital Artist Uses AI To Recreate “The Lord Of The Rings” Characters Based On Book Descriptions
>
1/14
<