-1
1.
Fie 1 year ago
#8
Nazgul are fictional characters? Really?
Nazgul are fictional characters? Really?
-3
2.
Kenji 1 year ago
Nazgul are the creatures not the riders.
0
3.
Becky 1 year ago
Quote: Kenji
Nazgûl
Your nerd is weak.Stick to Star Wars.
4
4.
Adam 1 year ago
Tolkien paid very little attention to describing any details of the appearances of characters. The Balrog, for example, was only described as a menacing creature shrouded in fire, darkness and shadow. That's it.
Some characters, like Tom Bombadil and Gandalf were described in a little more detail, and to that effect, #1 is so far off as to be offensive.
Really, all of these are terrible. Why the heck does Frodo have face tattoos?? This "artist" s#cks.
Some characters, like Tom Bombadil and Gandalf were described in a little more detail, and to that effect, #1 is so far off as to be offensive.
Really, all of these are terrible. Why the heck does Frodo have face tattoos?? This "artist" s#cks.
4
5.
Louis 1 year ago
What's with all the detail in Gimli's face, and Aragorn's looks smooth as a baby's bottom? It almost looks unfinished
0
6.
Wesley 1 year ago
Louis,
The "artist" had to upgrade and reboot halfway through.
The "artist" had to upgrade and reboot halfway through.
Nazgul are fictional characters? Really?
Some characters, like Tom Bombadil and Gandalf were described in a little more detail, and to that effect, #1 is so far off as to be offensive.
Really, all of these are terrible. Why the heck does Frodo have face tattoos?? This "artist" s#cks.
The "artist" had to upgrade and reboot halfway through.