2
1.
Philip 1 year ago
#1
It's called an "out of place artifact" basically something that according to science shouldn't exist. I think there was a coin found in a chunk of coal and a hammer with a supposedly petrified wooden handle. Doesn't mean they're real just kinda raises questions...
It's called an "out of place artifact" basically something that according to science shouldn't exist. I think there was a coin found in a chunk of coal and a hammer with a supposedly petrified wooden handle. Doesn't mean they're real just kinda raises questions...
0
2.
Woody 1 year ago
Philip,
Yeah, honestly there isn't enough info to make any actual conclusions.
Yeah, honestly there isn't enough info to make any actual conclusions.
3
3.
Andrea 1 year ago
#11 first of all, no sh#t Sherlock. Second: most smiths didn't forge weapons but horseshoes, nails, and other stuff around the house
0
4.
Madie 1 year ago
Andrea,
I think the idea is that they forge, they don't fight. More of them survive wars to carry on the name.
I think the idea is that they forge, they don't fight. More of them survive wars to carry on the name.
5
5.
Loren 1 year ago
#7 So did Monica Lewinsky.
0
6.
Woody 1 year ago
#1 Umm, considering most scientists now think 30,000 years is a closer estimate... and people have the ability to dig... and landslides do happen... how old is it?
It's called an "out of place artifact" basically something that according to science shouldn't exist. I think there was a coin found in a chunk of coal and a hammer with a supposedly petrified wooden handle. Doesn't mean they're real just kinda raises questions...
Yeah, honestly there isn't enough info to make any actual conclusions.
I think the idea is that they forge, they don't fight. More of them survive wars to carry on the name.