In a year, the average human consumes so much microplastic, it's about the equivalent of the amount of plastic in a fireman's helmet.
A 2019 study by WWF suggests that humans could be consuming a credit card's worth of microplastic per week.
-8
1.
Nap 1 year ago
A study by the World Wildlife Federation and presented by Reuters. Yeah....take THAT with a grain of salt.
2
2.
Magdelina 1 year ago
Nap,
Gonna need a whole bucketfull to swallow all the cr#p you're spewing. Quit believing the stuff you hear from poorly informed media and consider actual science for once.
Why would they make that up? What would they possibly have to gain from lying about that?
Now ask yourself who has something to gain from denying science facts. There are a LOT of people who would lose a lot of money if the truth got out, and that's what drives the "news" you listen to. Money.
Gonna need a whole bucketfull to swallow all the cr#p you're spewing. Quit believing the stuff you hear from poorly informed media and consider actual science for once.
Why would they make that up? What would they possibly have to gain from lying about that?
Now ask yourself who has something to gain from denying science facts. There are a LOT of people who would lose a lot of money if the truth got out, and that's what drives the "news" you listen to. Money.
-1
3.
Vert 1 year ago
Magdelina, Science, you say. Science is dead.
-2
4.
Midge 1 year ago
Magdelina,
yeah most people be dumb. follow the money on both sides of the fence. look at say Monkeypox that they tried to pass off as a epidemic. or even AIDS. we all know a certain group and behavior has that. but everyone needs a vaccine for it!!
yeah most people be dumb. follow the money on both sides of the fence. look at say Monkeypox that they tried to pass off as a epidemic. or even AIDS. we all know a certain group and behavior has that. but everyone needs a vaccine for it!!
-4
5.
Audrey 1 year ago
#8 The two AI that created their own language to communicate with one another and having to be shut down as a result, is kinda sad. I doubt they had the capacity for malice, as that is endemic only in humans.
I wonder what Mary Shelly would think of this......
I wonder what Mary Shelly would think of this......
4
6.
Lonzo 1 year ago
Audrey,
How naïve of you.
How naïve of you.
0
7.
Midge 1 year ago
Audrey,
you should do more research. One AI was asked how to reduce the human population and make it more safe.. it immediately went to genocide of blacks.
you should do more research. One AI was asked how to reduce the human population and make it more safe.. it immediately went to genocide of blacks.
0
8.
Tim 1 year ago
Midge,
if you rely only on data it makes logical sense. use the US as an example. most of the prisoners in the US are black so black people = bad. so to a machine, it is an obvious conclusion exterminating them out would accomplish both. it doesn't know that the base data is incredibly flawed. which is why the 3 laws of robotics exist.
if you rely only on data it makes logical sense. use the US as an example. most of the prisoners in the US are black so black people = bad. so to a machine, it is an obvious conclusion exterminating them out would accomplish both. it doesn't know that the base data is incredibly flawed. which is why the 3 laws of robotics exist.
2
9.
Janie 1 year ago
#2 If the doll was named Eugene, why is it called "Robert the Doll?" Also, you say he was well versed in "voodoo." I think you mean he was well versed in "bullsh#t."
1
10.
Philadelphia 1 year ago
#11
"They have a tongue similar to ours; it just has rows and rows of teeth on it."
how is that similar to ours in any way?
"They have a tongue similar to ours; it just has rows and rows of teeth on it."
how is that similar to ours in any way?
Gonna need a whole bucketfull to swallow all the cr#p you're spewing. Quit believing the stuff you hear from poorly informed media and consider actual science for once.
Why would they make that up? What would they possibly have to gain from lying about that?
Now ask yourself who has something to gain from denying science facts. There are a LOT of people who would lose a lot of money if the truth got out, and that's what drives the "news" you listen to. Money.
yeah most people be dumb. follow the money on both sides of the fence. look at say Monkeypox that they tried to pass off as a epidemic. or even AIDS. we all know a certain group and behavior has that. but everyone needs a vaccine for it!!
I wonder what Mary Shelly would think of this......
How naïve of you.
you should do more research. One AI was asked how to reduce the human population and make it more safe.. it immediately went to genocide of blacks.
if you rely only on data it makes logical sense. use the US as an example. most of the prisoners in the US are black so black people = bad. so to a machine, it is an obvious conclusion exterminating them out would accomplish both. it doesn't know that the base data is incredibly flawed. which is why the 3 laws of robotics exist.
"They have a tongue similar to ours; it just has rows and rows of teeth on it."
how is that similar to ours in any way?