4
1.
Waldo 2 year s ago
#49 we don't need no stinkin' seat belts!
-1
2.
Mamie 2 year s ago
#47 except it wasn't, science has since confirmed that the ozone hole was a naturally-occurring, cyclical phenomenon that goes on every year.
2
3.
Arthur 2 year s ago
Mamie,
Oh? Is that why it has taken almost 30 years to replenish the depleted ozone since the Montreal Protocol essentially createdwidespread ban on producing ozone depleting chemicals through industrial processes?
#2 NOPE. Be better at science before captioning.
Oh? Is that why it has taken almost 30 years to replenish the depleted ozone since the Montreal Protocol essentially createdwidespread ban on producing ozone depleting chemicals through industrial processes?
#2 NOPE. Be better at science before captioning.
2
4.
Midge 2 year s ago
Arthur,
totally coincidental. can you link to actual changes instead of protocol? i see that the summit and accords have been meeting for decades and climate change has not been affected.
totally coincidental. can you link to actual changes instead of protocol? i see that the summit and accords have been meeting for decades and climate change has not been affected.
1
5.
Blanche 2 year s ago
Midge,
Your ignorance is showing. Climate change and the ozone are not equivalent. You specifically stated falsehood about ozone depletion, I corrected your misinformation with reference to the protocol which affected the ozone issue.
You are now trying to misdirect because of your flawed fundamentals.
Be better or STFU.
Your ignorance is showing. Climate change and the ozone are not equivalent. You specifically stated falsehood about ozone depletion, I corrected your misinformation with reference to the protocol which affected the ozone issue.
You are now trying to misdirect because of your flawed fundamentals.
Be better or STFU.
4
6.
Hopkins 2 year s ago
Blanche,
Man, you really hate that pesky old 1st Amendment, dontcha?
Man, you really hate that pesky old 1st Amendment, dontcha?
-4
7.
Blanche 2 year s ago
Hopkins,
1st amendment allows you to say stupid things and spread misinformation, just the same as the First Amendment allows me to contradict.
Fair game, dipsh#t.
Hopkins,
I have to reply again, because this... this sentiment that an American ideal (the Right to Free Expression) is misrepresented as something that prevents other people from criticizing what was said through the free expression.
The First Amendment does not protect anyone from criticism. It only applies within the USA, and only to US citizens/corporations.
To everyone else on the planet (the other 7.4billion people) seem to understand that if you say stupid shit, you will be criticized.
So, why is it that the US Citizens are so ignorant?
1st amendment allows you to say stupid things and spread misinformation, just the same as the First Amendment allows me to contradict.
Fair game, dipsh#t.
Hopkins,
I have to reply again, because this... this sentiment that an American ideal (the Right to Free Expression) is misrepresented as something that prevents other people from criticizing what was said through the free expression.
The First Amendment does not protect anyone from criticism. It only applies within the USA, and only to US citizens/corporations.
To everyone else on the planet (the other 7.4billion people) seem to understand that if you say stupid shit, you will be criticized.
So, why is it that the US Citizens are so ignorant?
-2
8.
Abigail 2 year s ago
Blanche,
Who are you trying to convince, her…or yourself? Your additional comment inadvertently proves you’re full of sh#t. You seem to think that free speech is for you and not for anyone else. You…are…a…fascist.
Who are you trying to convince, her…or yourself? Your additional comment inadvertently proves you’re full of sh#t. You seem to think that free speech is for you and not for anyone else. You…are…a…fascist.
3
9.
Arthur 2 year s ago
Abigail,
Did you read it upside down, because it is the opposite of what you say.
Did you read it upside down, because it is the opposite of what you say.
2
10.
Arthur 2 year s ago
Blanche,
I haven't met an American who clearly understands their rights within their own country, let alone when traveling elsewhere. It is why there is the stereotype for American travelers.
I haven't met an American who clearly understands their rights within their own country, let alone when traveling elsewhere. It is why there is the stereotype for American travelers.
3
11.
Submit 2 year s ago
Arthur,
"Holes" in the ozone existed long before aerosols and other chemicals that people use. It IS a natural phenomena. Just like the fact that the climate changed long before people populated the planet.
"Holes" in the ozone existed long before aerosols and other chemicals that people use. It IS a natural phenomena. Just like the fact that the climate changed long before people populated the planet.
2
12.
Dilly 2 year s ago
#5 F@#kin' Russians think their b@lls are bigger than they actually are.
4
13.
Nellie 2 year s ago
#26 Is that before or after people try mating with them? 
1
14.
Brina 2 year s ago
#31 For the 1st sight I thought this was another level in Wolfeinstein 3D.
0
15.
Ginger 2 year s ago
#29 "....a beautiful car ahead of it is time."
Oh? Is that why it has taken almost 30 years to replenish the depleted ozone since the Montreal Protocol essentially createdwidespread ban on producing ozone depleting chemicals through industrial processes?
#2 NOPE. Be better at science before captioning.
totally coincidental. can you link to actual changes instead of protocol? i see that the summit and accords have been meeting for decades and climate change has not been affected.
Your ignorance is showing. Climate change and the ozone are not equivalent. You specifically stated falsehood about ozone depletion, I corrected your misinformation with reference to the protocol which affected the ozone issue.
You are now trying to misdirect because of your flawed fundamentals.
Be better or STFU.
Man, you really hate that pesky old 1st Amendment, dontcha?
1st amendment allows you to say stupid things and spread misinformation, just the same as the First Amendment allows me to contradict.
Fair game, dipsh#t.
Hopkins,
I have to reply again, because this... this sentiment that an American ideal (the Right to Free Expression) is misrepresented as something that prevents other people from criticizing what was said through the free expression.
The First Amendment does not protect anyone from criticism. It only applies within the USA, and only to US citizens/corporations.
To everyone else on the planet (the other 7.4billion people) seem to understand that if you say stupid shit, you will be criticized.
So, why is it that the US Citizens are so ignorant?
Who are you trying to convince, her…or yourself? Your additional comment inadvertently proves you’re full of sh#t. You seem to think that free speech is for you and not for anyone else. You…are…a…fascist.
Did you read it upside down, because it is the opposite of what you say.
I haven't met an American who clearly understands their rights within their own country, let alone when traveling elsewhere. It is why there is the stereotype for American travelers.
"Holes" in the ozone existed long before aerosols and other chemicals that people use. It IS a natural phenomena. Just like the fact that the climate changed long before people populated the planet.