4
1.
Coco 1 year ago
Not exactly all diy
6
2.
Assene 1 year ago
#1 "Ma'am...do you know why I pulled you over?"
"Oh dear... is one of my tail light's out?"
"Umm...no ma'am."
#3 Destined to become an offensive riddle when drones become sentient.
#7 "Which Volvo were you interested in purchasing, sir?"
"The one with the least scorched paint would be preferable."
"Oh dear... is one of my tail light's out?"
"Umm...no ma'am."
#3 Destined to become an offensive riddle when drones become sentient.
#7 "Which Volvo were you interested in purchasing, sir?"
"The one with the least scorched paint would be preferable."
1
3.
Bertha 1 year ago
#23 fake 
-1
4.
Frank 1 year ago
#23 Why reduce the wheel diameter for flat ground?
0
5.
Brina 1 year ago
Frank,
Stability and agility.
With lower diameter the mass of gravity is lower and the front wheels are touching the ground, so it can turn in a more stable way and does not require energy to keep it steady. Increasing the diameter gets the front wheels get out from the way, but requires energy to keep it steady and probably cannot turn on the staircase.
In cycling there were bikes with huge wheels. It was smooth, but had high air resistance and POG was too high. 29" seems the right fit. With that you can climb stairs. The 32" is too big and not agile at all. And 26" is cheap as balls and good fit for the 175cm "average" height.
Stability and agility.
With lower diameter the mass of gravity is lower and the front wheels are touching the ground, so it can turn in a more stable way and does not require energy to keep it steady. Increasing the diameter gets the front wheels get out from the way, but requires energy to keep it steady and probably cannot turn on the staircase.
In cycling there were bikes with huge wheels. It was smooth, but had high air resistance and POG was too high. 29" seems the right fit. With that you can climb stairs. The 32" is too big and not agile at all. And 26" is cheap as balls and good fit for the 175cm "average" height.
-2
6.
Eunice 1 year ago
Frank,
It's computer generated. It's not real.
It's computer generated. It's not real.
0
7.
Onicyphorous 1 year ago
#18 #19 hell no!
1
8.
Brina 1 year ago
#1 RED!
#11 What is that?
#11 What is that?
1
9.
Lanny 1 year ago
#13 #14 healthy no mask 
0
10.
Gertrude 1 year ago
#1
Front wheel drive?
#4
No morter needed.
Front wheel drive?
#4
No morter needed.
0
11.
Eunice 1 year ago
Gertrude,
Yes sir, FWD.
Yes sir, FWD.
"Oh dear... is one of my tail light's out?"
"Umm...no ma'am."
#3 Destined to become an offensive riddle when drones become sentient.
#7 "Which Volvo were you interested in purchasing, sir?"
"The one with the least scorched paint would be preferable."
Stability and agility.
With lower diameter the mass of gravity is lower and the front wheels are touching the ground, so it can turn in a more stable way and does not require energy to keep it steady. Increasing the diameter gets the front wheels get out from the way, but requires energy to keep it steady and probably cannot turn on the staircase.
In cycling there were bikes with huge wheels. It was smooth, but had high air resistance and POG was too high. 29" seems the right fit. With that you can climb stairs. The 32" is too big and not agile at all. And 26" is cheap as balls and good fit for the 175cm "average" height.
It's computer generated. It's not real.
#11 What is that?
Front wheel drive?
#4
No morter needed.
Yes sir, FWD.