X
-5
1.
Allisandra 7 month s ago
#4 If all these ideas were activated, Usa would be poor and wont have so much money for army.
in fact Usa would stand for Union of soviet america.
       
7
2.
Bradford 7 month s ago
Allisandra,

More importantly, none of those things are the purview of the federal government...defense is.
       
3
3.
Johannah 7 month s ago
#16 camila has passed the age of 22 - nice 2 know
       
4
4.
Ade 7 month s ago
#4 if you give people houses, no one would buy houses and the whole housing market would collapse. People who don’t pay for stuff also don’t maintain/repair stuff so the whole USA would turn into a giant slum and you would have to keep building new free houses to replace the neglected one. Never ending problem.
       
-5
5.
Georgiana 7 month s ago
Ade,

Wow... who is feeding you that "info"? Faux News or OAN?

US needs to stop being the world's policeman and cut the budget by half. Don't need to "buy" things for people but helping people get ahead (or out of a bad situation) only makes everyone better. Still have to work... still have to earn... just help people have the necessities of life... shelter, health care, food, education. It's not hard, but people just have to care about others besides themselves.
       
10
6.
Midge 7 month s ago
Georgiana,
no he has a point. ever been on a rez? fully government funded...trash. kids give up school by 14 because they get handouts. they don't care about the future because it's taken from them. Helping people "get ahead" does not make everyone better. how does always enabling the weakest help the rest? promoting the lazy, help the managers? do you help your elder neighbors? or play games on your phone?
       
-7
7.
Natius 7 month s ago
Midge,

ever been to a country that actually implements something like this? Seems not... acute
       
3
8.
Georgiana 7 month s ago
#33 I think COVID is about 6.9M now... time to update the graphic
       
0
9.
Natius 7 month s ago
Ade,

remember 2008? That's when all the people who bought houses couldn't pay for them any longer. Was that any better?
       
4
10.
Georgiana 7 month s ago
#22 make those a-holes clean it up!
       
0
11.
Natius 7 month s ago
#3 is that $80 "because we can fee"?
       
4
12.
Waldo 7 month s ago
Natius,

yes. That is freedom for you. The freedom to not be regulated by a government and do as you please.
       
-10
13.
Delpha 7 month s ago
Waldo,

yeah, land of the "free".

Propaganda got them good, though
       
1
14.
Waldo 7 month s ago
#38 the larger the @$$hole, the more toiletpaper is needed.
       
0
15.
Lynn 7 month s ago
#22 The highest plastic waste polluters are where everybody else sends their waste.
       
1
16.
Liley 7 month s ago
Europeans: "Here's what we think of Americans!"
Americans: "We don't think about you at all."
       
-8
17.
Waldo 7 month s ago
Liley,

Americans: "We don't think at all."
       
0
18.
Marty 7 month s ago
#29... Noticeably missing: Dutch

#30... Noticeably missing: Cliff Richard
       
0
19.
Abby 6 month s ago
#26 This is NOT enough info to be of ANY value and is HIGHLY misleading. SIDS is not even mentioned, nor does it say where the sample was from, because infant mortality causes in Africa is VERY different than infant mortality causes in Europe.
       
0
20.
Abby 6 month s ago
#34 Ironically, I was forced to read all the top ten banned books when I was in JR High in the 90's. My teachers thought it was important for us to know WHY they were controversial. I hated most, but not for the reasons they were banned, I loved those parts... I honestly didn't like their writing styles.
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot
X
Visualizing Data: Compelling Infographics That Challenge Your Worldview
>
1/38
<