#6 This is only true for stupid people. Unfortunately, most people are stupid. Also, leading scientists have been the trusted experts for millennia. They have to motive to lie about their discoveries. The kind of people who lie for personal gain are not the kind of people who become scientists, but people who try to discredit scientific evidence are the sort of people who lie for personal gain.
Theotha, Except for climate scientists vying for grant money and Mandeep R. Mehrah (no longer MD) et al and their Hydoxychloroquine paper with all the false data and Harald Walach and his paper that claimed the CoViD-19 vaccine killed two people for every three it saved and...
Theotha, no scientist discredit evidence. that's frowned upon. they all fall in line with one scientist who's wrong a lot. like why is peer reviewed papers always agreed on by consensus? science isnt consensus, it's about critical thinking
#6 This is only true for stupid people. Unfortunately, most people are stupid. Also, leading scientists have been the trusted experts for millennia. They have to motive to lie about their discoveries. The kind of people who lie for personal gain are not the kind of people who become scientists, but people who try to discredit scientific evidence are the sort of people who lie for personal gain.
Theotha, Except for climate scientists vying for grant money and Mandeep R. Mehrah (no longer MD) et al and their Hydoxychloroquine paper with all the false data and Harald Walach and his paper that claimed the CoViD-19 vaccine killed two people for every three it saved and...
Theotha, no scientist discredit evidence. that's frowned upon. they all fall in line with one scientist who's wrong a lot. like why is peer reviewed papers always agreed on by consensus? science isnt consensus, it's about critical thinking
Hahahahahaha. Scientists lie for personal gain all the time.
There’s no way you actually believe what you wrote. That HAS to be satire.
no scientist discredit evidence. that's frowned upon. they all fall in line with one scientist who's wrong a lot. like why is peer reviewed papers always agreed on by consensus? science isnt consensus, it's about critical thinking
DCC, minidisk