-2
1.
Sibbie 1 year ago
#5 "Raised".. he "raised" a pumpkin?
Like, he lifted it up?
Or did he taught it right from wrong?
Like, he lifted it up?
Or did he taught it right from wrong?
1
2.
Dom 1 year ago
Sibbie, Or did he TEACH it to speak English?
1
3.
Sibbie 1 year ago
Dom,
what was I thinking..?
what was I thinking..?
0
4.
Wallace 1 year ago
Sibbie, I just wish I could downvote your nonsense more than just once.
-3
5.
Sibbie 1 year ago
#29 "Smart".. how "smart" is that toilet?
Like, can it detect dirty @holes?
Or does it do math?
Like, can it detect dirty @holes?
Or does it do math?
1
6.
Dom 1 year ago
Sibbie, It gets Tubi and Pluto TV
3
7.
Curg 1 year ago
#21
What an amazing concept, using wind to make ships move across the ocean. It seems like I've heard about the idea before, maybe it was in some sci-fi book since it's such a futuristic technology...
What an amazing concept, using wind to make ships move across the ocean. It seems like I've heard about the idea before, maybe it was in some sci-fi book since it's such a futuristic technology...
1
8.
Christiana 1 year ago
Curg, it's not the concept that is novel, it's the fact that they actually executed the concept on a modern, non-sailing, ship.
-3
9.
Molly 1 year ago
Christiana,
that just proves it's twice as dumb. like when apple made cords for your airpods
that just proves it's twice as dumb. like when apple made cords for your airpods
1
10.
Jeanette 1 year ago
#43 - What's with that gigantic car in the bottom left?
0
11.
Virdie 1 year ago
Jeanette,
There are three oversized cars... that look a lot like my kids toys... these are just a bunch of toys
There are three oversized cars... that look a lot like my kids toys... these are just a bunch of toys
4
12.
Haseltine 1 year ago
#36 It was not NASA that demoted Pluto, it was the International Astronomical Union; NASA just did not have the time or patience to argue with the nimrods.
Who says that we have to listen to the IAU anyway.
Who says that we have to listen to the IAU anyway.
2
13.
Ivan 1 year ago
Haseltine,
Well what do you expect from any organization with Neil DeGrasse Tyson as the moderator
Well what do you expect from any organization with Neil DeGrasse Tyson as the moderator
1
14.
Ivan 1 year ago
#21 you mean sails? LOL I despair for modern people
2
15.
Tim 1 year ago
Ivan,
Unfortunately, traditional sails are not practical for a ship of this size and weight. Although the current estimates are not exact, they anticipate a potential reduction of 3 tonnes of fuel per day, resulting in a cost savings of approximately $2,400 per day.
Unfortunately, traditional sails are not practical for a ship of this size and weight. Although the current estimates are not exact, they anticipate a potential reduction of 3 tonnes of fuel per day, resulting in a cost savings of approximately $2,400 per day.
1
16.
Shaina 1 year ago
#29 Female move but no male move? Why not just have move?
2
17.
Shaina 1 year ago
#34 Hotel Panorama in what is now Slovakia. Probably designed by a Czech.
5
18.
Shaina 1 year ago
#42 That will impress them at job interviews.
0
19.
Debora 1 year ago
#33 Monster..!!! What have you done..!???
-1
20.
Debora 1 year ago
#44 What a dork..!!!
0
21.
Muriel 1 year ago
#33 Cute. He painted a bird about to be crushed.
Like, he lifted it up?
Or did he taught it right from wrong?
what was I thinking..?
Like, can it detect dirty @holes?
Or does it do math?
What an amazing concept, using wind to make ships move across the ocean. It seems like I've heard about the idea before, maybe it was in some sci-fi book since it's such a futuristic technology...
that just proves it's twice as dumb. like when apple made cords for your airpods
There are three oversized cars... that look a lot like my kids toys... these are just a bunch of toys
Who says that we have to listen to the IAU anyway.
Well what do you expect from any organization with Neil DeGrasse Tyson as the moderator
Unfortunately, traditional sails are not practical for a ship of this size and weight. Although the current estimates are not exact, they anticipate a potential reduction of 3 tonnes of fuel per day, resulting in a cost savings of approximately $2,400 per day.