X
2
1.
Percy 7 month s ago
#3 you may mean documentary
       
-2
2.
Virdie 7 month s ago
#14 Even worse, the military EXPECTS those number to die to PROVE the significance of the attack. Hearing elders support the Hiroshima bombs as "SAVING" millions of lives us based on these theoretical numbers.
       
0
3.
Archilles 7 month s ago
#15 Damn you, Thanos!
       
1
4.
Dobbin 7 month s ago
#11
That 100% death rate is not true actually.
At least one person survived. acute

Search for "Jeanna Giese" for more info.
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

"The astonishing fatality rates that can be found in so many battles in the First World War weren’t accidents or unfortunate byproducts of the technology – they were factored into the battle plans.

By the nature of attritional warfare it was calculated how many men would be lost every week and commanders drew up enough reinforcements to replace them. This was called “Normal Wastage”."

 

X
Disturbing Realities: Creepy Facts That Make You Question Everything
>
14/15
<