Unfortunately that's generally not true, otherwise the fire bombing of Dresden and Tokyo would be considered War Crimes just like the horrors committed by Japan in China during the war. But since the Allies won they were "necessary" and "saved lives in the long run" just a less biased opinion...
Unfortunately that's generally not true, otherwise the fire bombing of Dresden and Tokyo would be considered War Crimes just like the horrors committed by Japan in China during the war. But since the Allies won they were "necessary" and "saved lives in the long run" just a less biased opinion...
Not if they manage to convince the world they are right. (History is written be the victors)
History is written by THE BYSTANDERS, who had no hand in the history or battle. Just a bias opinion.
Unfortunately that's generally not true, otherwise the fire bombing of Dresden and Tokyo would be considered War Crimes just like the horrors committed by Japan in China during the war. But since the Allies won they were "necessary" and "saved lives in the long run" just a less biased opinion...
In science there is no such thing as convincing, just facts that don't change and theories that are constantly being challenged.
the difference between conspiracy and facts is about 6 months.
People seem to be confusing history and science. But you are not wrong.
Al Gore and “An inconvenient truth”
And Paul Krugman calling the internet a fad.