X
Comments to #15
All comments (2)
1
1.
Lineau 3 month s ago
#15 Doesn't make sense. He offered the sale, you say, but you're also saying he bought enough shares to get control of the company, then fired himself?
0
2.
Wilber 3 month s ago
#9 This kind of thing is shockingly common there are plenty of revolutionary useful technologies that are kept secret and buried by big corporations because it would cost them or make them less money. Big pharma could be sitting on a cure for diabetes and not make it public because an insulin subscription is more lucrative. I am also legally required to tell that such a cure does not exist.
"In 1962, investor Warren Buffett agreed to sell shares of a failing company for $11.50 per share. The tender offer was for only $11.375, so Buffett decided to buy more stock, took control of the company and fired the man who made the offer."
1
1.
Lineau 3 month s ago
#15 Doesn't make sense. He offered the sale, you say, but you're also saying he bought enough shares to get control of the company, then fired himself?
0
2.
Wilber 3 month s ago
#9 This kind of thing is shockingly common there are plenty of revolutionary useful technologies that are kept secret and buried by big corporations because it would cost them or make them less money. Big pharma could be sitting on a cure for diabetes and not make it public because an insulin subscription is more lucrative. I am also legally required to tell that such a cure does not exist.