1
1.
Myrti 3 month s ago
#1 is gonna trigger some overly sensitive folks ...
5
2.
Freddie 3 month s ago
Myrti, Nah, its just mistaken. But check the other post for psychological fallacies.
11
3.
Belinda 3 month s ago
Myrti, It's not a matter of being overly sensitive - it's a matter of the basic premise being flawed. We aren't bystanders watching others play a game. We are in the game. The game has rules that have been defined for centuries - rules that were put together by a consensus. But many that are in the game don't like the defined rules. There are defined processes for changing the rules. But instead of following the process to get the rules changed they instead resort to low brow methods of screwing up the game for everyone else. Sometimes even the referees will try to change the rules without following the process and this really screws up the game because then someone has to get the game back on track.
-10
4.
Virdie 3 month s ago
Belinda,
Kinda like... centuries of women being treated as less than men, creating entire Sciences based on fallacious theories, that dehumanizing women and people from other ethnicities. Then women legally have to be declared equal, removing the actual barrier, and all those Sciences go out the window. The prejudice still remains, because it is still taught, but it can't legally do what it once did.
Kinda like... centuries of women being treated as less than men, creating entire Sciences based on fallacious theories, that dehumanizing women and people from other ethnicities. Then women legally have to be declared equal, removing the actual barrier, and all those Sciences go out the window. The prejudice still remains, because it is still taught, but it can't legally do what it once did.
14
5.
Eben 3 month s ago
Virdie,
The difference is Belinda concisely explained the basic flawed premise of the issue in question. You however, merely inserted closed minded feminist grievance where feelings take the place of logic.
The difference is Belinda concisely explained the basic flawed premise of the issue in question. You however, merely inserted closed minded feminist grievance where feelings take the place of logic.
0
6.
Arie 3 month s ago
Myrti,
I see the issue as, who decided what another needs? What is that support? Resources are limited, so what is fair to be given of what someone else worked hard for?
I see the issue as, who decided what another needs? What is that support? Resources are limited, so what is fair to be given of what someone else worked hard for?
-1
7.
Mena 3 month s ago
Arie, the society decides. Those that find it disagreeable are free to leave. You just have to live within the established rules.
0
8.
Karonhappuck 3 month s ago
Mena,
Lamentably, it is not society that decides. It's those who control society that decides.
If society alone were to make all of the meaningful decisions...there would be no Left Wing authoritarian fascism and we would be the much safer, stronger Constitutional Republic we used to be.
Lamentably, it is not society that decides. It's those who control society that decides.
If society alone were to make all of the meaningful decisions...there would be no Left Wing authoritarian fascism and we would be the much safer, stronger Constitutional Republic we used to be.
2
9.
Horace 3 month s ago
Cool Post thank u
1
10.
Virdie 3 month s ago
#24 Since when was "Webby" related to Scrodge? Isn't it supposed to be "Webigale" granddaughter of Mrs. Beakly the maid, whose parents are never spoken of?
0
11.
Virdie 3 month s ago
#35 I don't use any of those grips. I think the chart is missing s lot of
options.
options.
1
12.
Dora 3 month s ago
Virdie, I don't think gripping the crayon with your whole fist needs a name. Most toddlers grow out of that.
3
13.
Linda 3 month s ago
#9 PETA People Eating Tasty Animals.
0
14.
Feltie 3 month s ago
Linda,
Exactly!
Now how about a chart of all the plants that are slaughtered every day for food.
Or a chart of all the animals killed every day by carnivores in the wild.
Exactly!
Now how about a chart of all the plants that are slaughtered every day for food.
Or a chart of all the animals killed every day by carnivores in the wild.
0
15.
Roseanne 3 month s ago
#13 Good luck with that one...
Kinda like... centuries of women being treated as less than men, creating entire Sciences based on fallacious theories, that dehumanizing women and people from other ethnicities. Then women legally have to be declared equal, removing the actual barrier, and all those Sciences go out the window. The prejudice still remains, because it is still taught, but it can't legally do what it once did.
The difference is Belinda concisely explained the basic flawed premise of the issue in question. You however, merely inserted closed minded feminist grievance where feelings take the place of logic.
I see the issue as, who decided what another needs? What is that support? Resources are limited, so what is fair to be given of what someone else worked hard for?
Lamentably, it is not society that decides. It's those who control society that decides.
If society alone were to make all of the meaningful decisions...there would be no Left Wing authoritarian fascism and we would be the much safer, stronger Constitutional Republic we used to be.
options.
Exactly!
Now how about a chart of all the plants that are slaughtered every day for food.
Or a chart of all the animals killed every day by carnivores in the wild.