X
-3
1.
Rodger 1 month ago
#14 - those lower lights aren’t the brake lights. You can clearly see the brake above. Someone probably miswired it.
       
5
2.
Antonia 1 month ago
You sound stupid when you say “unhoused”.
       
-2
3.
Gilbert 1 month ago
Antonia, and the stupidity doubles down with "anti-unhoused".
       
0
4.
Vert 1 weeks ago
Antonia, You make it crystal clear you have never studied so much as one minute of linguistics. Not one single linguist I've ever known would say something such as what you've written.
       
1
5.
Stu 1 month ago
I find the phrase unhoused offensive. You do not need to have a house to have a home.
       
0
6.
Vert 1 weeks ago
Stu, It doesn't say 'unhomed'; it says 'unhoused'. No wonder you're offended; you clearly aren't able to discern between the two.
       
0
7.
Ronie 1 month ago
I wouldn't go as far as calling most of this "design".
       
0
8.
Vert 1 weeks ago
Ronie, Someone has to create the plans for even the simplest of objects. That would be called 'design'. The creator would be the designer. Hence, 'design'.
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

This confusing warning sign:

X
Dangerous Designs That Defy Logic
>
13/36
<