1
1.
Greta 11 hours ago
#39
Had it sitting right next to the chlorine storage did we?
Had it sitting right next to the chlorine storage did we?
1
2.
Nibby 1 hour ago
#24 looks like a cross cable and a lot of switches recognize this. that cable is probs not your problem.
I've seen worse though. An electrician who put the strands in at random. Still the cable, kinda, worked. Lots of packet loss, but nothing the user noticed:)
I've seen worse though. An electrician who put the strands in at random. Still the cable, kinda, worked. Lots of packet loss, but nothing the user noticed:)
0
3.
Rudy 1 hour ago
Nibby,
Yeah, you're right. Beeing a cross-over cables means its probably pretty old though, maybe CAT 3, which would mean 16MBit/s maximum and unshielded at that.
So changing it probably fixed his problem for the wrong reason
Yeah, you're right. Beeing a cross-over cables means its probably pretty old though, maybe CAT 3, which would mean 16MBit/s maximum and unshielded at that.
So changing it probably fixed his problem for the wrong reason
0
4.
Nibby 1 hour ago
#25 that is impressive!
0
5.
Nibby 1 hour ago
#16 #37 #48 So much important work and no backup. Please people. If it's important store it on a redundant device and make backups!
Had it sitting right next to the chlorine storage did we?
I've seen worse though. An electrician who put the strands in at random. Still the cable, kinda, worked. Lots of packet loss, but nothing the user noticed:)
Yeah, you're right. Beeing a cross-over cables means its probably pretty old though, maybe CAT 3, which would mean 16MBit/s maximum and unshielded at that.
So changing it probably fixed his problem for the wrong reason